To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5563
5562  |  5564
Subject: 
Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:11:24 GMT
Viewed: 
4343 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Paul Easter wrote:

If we have not done so already, I would say we make a 'ophaned parts clause' and
display it on the parts tracker pages.

Yes, I think that sounds like a good idea.

The Contributor Agreement we are putting in place addresses taking over orphans
inasmuch as authors agree that LDraw.org has:
" - The right to create derivative works of the Work"

That covers it I think. The mechanics of how to do adoption are not clear
though, perhaps a periodic post of orphans or something?

I would say if there has been no author or last change author changes or notes
for some period of time, the part would be considered orphaned.

I already knew what you meant but I had trouble parsing that!

There are a few(maybe several) parts that I have posted what need some
attention. I simply do not have time to devote to them right now. If someone
wants to pick them up and run, go for it, please leave a note saying you are
doing so.
Emails are nice. I usually reply in a few days.

I agree, if someone wants to take over a part, an email is a good approach,
perhaps better than just up and doing it and submitting a new version. Less
surprises that way.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
 
(...) I think the method we currently use is good: Make all reasonable efforts to contact the author. If the author doesn't reply after a reasonable period of time (3-4 months is good) then make the fixes needed. Also, many held parts are known to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New game: Orphan part of the week
 
(...) If we have not done so already, I would say we make a 'ophaned parts clause' and display it on the parts tracker pages. I would say if there has been no author or last change author changes or notes for some period of time, the part would be (...) (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR