Subject:
|
Re: Subfiles - Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:34:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1187 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Bernd Broich wrote:
>
> > Can someone tell me what the criteria is to create a subpart, instead of
> > copying the whole code and rotate it a few times?
>
> > Any comment welcome.
>
> In general it's the symmetry, the file size or many repeating items of the
> part that makes sence to use subparts. In your case you can split it into
> 4 subparts, each one quarter of the file. So you could save filesize.
Why not 8 subparts? There are 8 symmetric sections in this part.
If you're going to use subfiles to reduce the overall datasize, go all
the way. :)
Unfortunately, cutting out a 1/8 slice of the part might force some
unnatural cuts. If this is the case (I think it will be), stick with a
1/4 subfile.
And the rail subfile should be only 1 of the four rails.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Subfiles - Question
|
| (...) That's what i've done this evening. I splitted the main file into one new subfile (32087s02.dat witch re-use the 2865s04.dat file)and the mainfile (32087_mainfile.dat). I couldn't add the small center track pieces too the 32087s02.dat file due (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Subfiles - Question
|
| (...) In general it's the symmetry, the file size or many repeating items of the part that makes sence to use subparts. In your case you can split it into 4 subparts, each one quarter of the file. So you could save filesize. e.g. only one track-end (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
