 | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker —Carsten Schmitz
|
| | | Hello Ludo, (...) There (...) I am/Was the reviewer. It is a very nice part. IMHO the wire should be removed and made a subpart of it. This subpart should be very very short so that you can use a tool like the Emacs Bendable thingie Creater to model (...) (23 years ago, 29-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker —Ludo Soete
|
| | | | (...) Hallo Carsten, First of all, Best Wishes for the New Year, or should i say : Prosit Neujahr ? 1) Thanks a lot for the info. I will remove the electric wire at the point where it leaves the connector, so that you can't look through the part (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) But you'll need two parts -- one for the top of the connector, and one for the bottom. And a third for the two put together... Steve (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker —Ludo Soete
|
| | | | (...) Hi Steve, A question for the top & bottom part: Must the top & bottom part be 100 percent accurate? I mean the sides that aren't visible when using it as an assembled piece? I have alreddy 2 parts, but they need some more work if they need to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) No, they don't have to be completely accurate. More accuracy is better, though. (...) Right. (...) Right, exactly. Nearly 100% of the usage will be the shortcut file. But LEGO identifies the top and bottom as two separate items, so we should (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
