Subject:
|
Re: Duplo parts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 18:17:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2063 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> Actually, AFAIK, the regular stud*.dat files should work fine -- they just
> need to be scaled up by a factor of two. Instead of writing:
>
> 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
>
> you'd do:
>
> 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 stud.dat
>
> Steve
Comparing relative sizes with some of my son's Duplo bricks last night, it looks
like the Duplo studs are a little shorter in height than two Lego studs.
A couple questions about detail - Duplo bricks all have a circular depression on
the top center with a little point in the middle. I guess this is something left
over from the manufacturing process. Is it an important enough visual feature
that it should be included in the models? What do people think?
Also, what about the "DUPLO" printed inside the hollow studs? (actually, older
Duplo bricks have "LEGO" printed in the studs, with the word Duplo printed
inside the brick).
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Duplo parts?
|
| (...) And the walls of the bottom tubes are certainly not twice as thick as on System parts. Note that the studs fit great between the bottom tubes, but they don't bind *at all* when placed inside the tubes. There is another type of stud that fits (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Duplo parts? [DAT]
|
| (...) Actually, AFAIK, the regular stud*.dat files should work fine -- they just need to be scaled up by a factor of two. Instead of writing: 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat you'd do: 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 stud.dat Steve (24 years ago, 25-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
