Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: Duplo parts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Dec 2000 03:59:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1618 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Rogerson writes:
> > I've thought about modeling some Duplo parts - has nobody really done this • yet?
> > Are there any primitives?
>
> No, but there are clear candidates - the top stud and the underneath "stud".
> Duplo is probably quite a rich development field for new authors, now
> thatthere seems to be a demand.
Actually, AFAIK, the regular stud*.dat files should work fine -- they just
need to be scaled up by a factor of two. Instead of writing:
1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat
you'd do:
1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 stud.dat
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Duplo parts?
|
| (...) Comparing relative sizes with some of my son's Duplo bricks last night, it looks like the Duplo studs are a little shorter in height than two Lego studs. A couple questions about detail - Duplo bricks all have a circular depression on the top (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Duplo parts?
|
| (...) yet? (...) No, but there are clear candidates - the top stud and the underneath "stud". Duplo is probably quite a rich development field for new authors, now thatthere seems to be a demand. Chris (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
