 | | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) Do you fancy a divide and conquer approach? If we each did different sections it might make it more possible. At the least it is a fairly easy part to subdivide. Tim (17 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) I wanted to start that part some month ago, but at a closer look I decided to not doing it because it is a real challenge. But I want that part very, very much. So please go ahead and make my dream come true. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
Hi all, Just thought I'd check to see if anyone was working on part 32475 ((URL) It's a horrid part to work on so I'm hoping someone has but realise it's probably unlikely. Thanks, Tim (17 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) You are right, but there are only three lines of code (easily created with MLCad) that would be substituted with such a new primitive. I think it is not worth. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) OK, I sent an updated version to the tracker admins, and BFCd it while I was at it. --Travis (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) Perhaps if there was a unit capped cylinder in the primitives authors would not be driven to use studs? Philo (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) OK, I'll do that (no votes yet...) (...) I agree. Philo (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) As far as I remember this is formally ok. But you are right, this should be avoided. Please correct that and send the file to the PT. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
30035.dat uses stud.dat in a location that isn't really a stud, but is the same shape as a stud. This leads to a rendering problem if stud logos are enabled: (URL) (Notice the LEGO logo peeking out from under the pole.) Is the above considered (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) If there are no current votes on the part I suggest to resubmit them. If they have already a certify vote send an email to the admin with a link to the part and the change he should do. I think also "Electric Power Functions" is a good name (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) I should indeed have paid more attention to that. Would it be best to resubmit parts with correct name, or simply (for me!!!) do an admin edit? Philo (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
Hi, the Power Functions parts currently at the PT are named: * 58119.dat - Electric Power Functions 9V Battery Box (Complete Shortcut) * 58120.dat - Electric Technic Power Functions Medium Motor Complete Shortcut * 58121.dat - Electric Technic Power (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mars mission IV
|
|
(...) Hi Claude, If you need to model your rover, I just LDrawed the solar panel and the supercap... (2 URLs) Philo (17 years ago, 16-Mar-08, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Some mistakes in the last update
|
|
(...) I have just corrected the two mentioned errors (303223 and 4210698). cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Some mistakes in the last update
|
|
Hi, after download the latest update (well, last weekend or so), I manually checked the newer files against my installed parts (from mid 2007). Irritating was the followeing: 30255 moved to 30225 (where is old 30225) 30255p01 (why not moved to (...) (17 years ago, 29-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: confusion with parts
|
|
(...) Hi Ramiro, it is known that 6093 in LDD references (URL) in LDraw 6093 is (URL) - a complete mismatch. Problem is, that we can correct the error only after the real 6093 - Minifig Hair Ponytail has been authored and submitted to the PT. In the (...) (17 years ago, 27-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | confusion with parts
|
|
hi, first post. i'd like to know why this two parts are listed in LDraw as the same, i've been looking for that ponytail and it's nowhere to be found. Wig, Ponytail Element Id: 4211165 Design Id: 6093 Mini Wig, Girl Element Id: 4274410 Design Id: (...) (17 years ago, 27-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Exhaust Pipes 71137 and x855 misaligned
|
|
(...) Almost correct but a few rings are in the wrong place still. I have commented on the tracker. (17 years ago, 24-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting OT: Where are the latest official parts files?
|
|
(...) Thanks Travis. It seems a bit hidden to find. Now I know to check the zip from time to time. Lutz (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting OT: Where are the latest official parts files?
|
|
(...) Look at the following post: (URL) you read that thread as a whole, you'll have a better understanding of the problem. However, the above post has a link to a page with a zip of all the unofficial parts (i.e., everything that's been added or (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
