 | | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Part 905.dat and 905c01.dat done! (sometimes it takes a bit ;-) I have updated the page at ldraw.org - (URL) as well as the Wiki - (URL) please give the Re-writes - (URL) high priority! w. (17 years ago, 22-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) hi folks, we still seek some input on the parts above. if you have the real version of those please measure/compare and let us know. w. (17 years ago, 17-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) It depends. Do you want the light to act more like it would through LEGO parts or do you want it to imitate a real car's headlights...? Anyway, the choice the user's. All you have to do is write the spotlight definitions ans run it through (...) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) strange when the headlights cast shadows backwards :-) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) At least, Jonathan's car now has gotten its original headlights back now - yet yellow instead of white. (URL) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Sorry, don't have the time to make models right now. I am currently writing a program to automatically create dat files of "shining" parts. I call it datshine.exe and I am very excited over it. Well, here's one quite strange model I rushed (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Pictures, we want pictures :-) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light [DAT]
|
|
(...) Thanks Anders! Only took half a year from idea to completion on this part ... /Tore 0 Brick 1 x 1 Round with Hollow Stud Yellow with POV Light 0 Name: 3062bL46.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial part 0 // based on work by James Jessiman (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) against official or non-official (...) differences. (...) comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see (...) I measured the real part and confirm that the LUT-part is correct! Matching the PT-Version (Trans-White) with the LUT-Version (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
(...) I think there should only ever be one primary author - nowadays, the one that takes the responsibility of submitting to the Parts Tracker. During the CA header migration, where I have encountered this and assessed that it was a true (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote: (I've > read that there's a major update on classic windows in the pipeline.) (...) Yes, see (URL) This shows how I decided to organise these files a while back. The CA header conversion is nearing (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) "A part I can buy" is not how we determine where to place a file. Since x322 represents a solid piece that a modeler may need to interact with directly (that is, give it a color). Looking at the files involved, the file locations and (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts ((URL) official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several differences. Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and comment? (LUT version may not match real (...) (17 years ago, 6-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) hmm ... looks like we got the "ideal" version as it has been projected by the part designers but the part was modified during the production. fact is we stick to the actual part as it comes out of the box and we will have to get rid off the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) it's a fine prog, anders! nonetheless I really wish it were a part of LDDP and not just a plug in - it doesn't allow polling to a viewer while I edit figures and to me visual feedback is crucial. BTW could you please check why Syncedit wipes (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) Hey! I have a user :-) Cool! Now I *must* update the web site... (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
Thanks, Willy, for this very informative article... I discovered many things (among them, Syncedit that looks VERY interesting - how did I miss its announcement???). (...) Here you had a favorable situation with mostly flat surfaces. Similarly I (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
When the Lego Universe Team has started to share rough data of 80 parts (URL) and soon after I've got feedback from part authors that because of their excellent quality those parts were heavyweights and would give us a hard time reducing the file (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
I think a part should only have one AUTHOR line (although, as you say, this is not stated in the library header spec) If a part has two or more authors, it falls into one of two possibilities a) Original author and one or more part modifier/updaters (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
