 | | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) Well, I finished the model I was working on and tried your suggestion. After completing the manual download instructions I tried to download a part that I tried unsuccessfully to download a while back. Unfortunately I still have the same (...) (17 years ago, 10-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) Thanks Steve. I'm not computer illiterate, but I'n not exactly computer fluent either. I'll try what you've suggested. One question before I do though: If parts from older versions are overwritten and I reinstall complete.exe, will it (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) Take a look at the Manual Install directions on ldraw.org: (URL) ldraw027.exe will overwrite a number of parts with older versions, so after you install the ldraw027.exe file, you will need to re-install complete.exe. Steve (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing primitives after part update.
|
|
(...) Hi all. I have been having the same problem. I checked and the above mentioned file was indeed missing so I downloaded it, but it's just sitting there all lonely on my desktop. What do I do with it now? Thanks in advance. (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Snowmobile tread hubs?
|
|
Yes I have just completed a first draft but have not submitted to LDraw yet. It still contains many error but is ready for use. Donald (17 years ago, 14-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Snowmobile tread hubs?
|
|
Anybody working on these wheels? (URL) (17 years ago, 11-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Trapezoid flag 2 X 2 unknown part number
|
|
(...) This is part 44676 and already on the Parts Tracker at : (URL) (17 years ago, 29-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Trapezoid flag 2 X 2 unknown part number [DAT]
|
|
Here is a model for the trapezoidal flag 2 X 2. The part had no visible number so any idea what to name it? 0 Flag 2 x 2 trapezoid 0 Name: unknown? 0 Author: Mark Kennedy 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 10 30 0 0 2 10 1 0 20 0 0 rect.dat 1 16 0 20 10 2 0 0 (...) (17 years ago, 29-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help need
|
|
(...) Si, accosento that the "pipistrello" part is not the best to begin with as an unexperienced LDraw author. I had it in my LDraw todo-bucket before I sold my LEGO collection. I regret that I didn't withhold that bucket from the deal, or I could (...) (17 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help need
|
|
(...) ciao miriana, la creazione di parts (specialmente di un freeform come il pipistrello) richiede una certa esperienza CAD per raggiungere un risultato soddisfacente in breve tempo - e comunque prima che il tutto diventasse troppo frustrante. se (...) (17 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Help need
|
|
Hi! I'm Miriana, from Italy. I'm a Lego fan and I need help to make own part. Now I'm making howgwarts castel and I noticed that some parts are not on database. Can I make them by my own? For example if I want make bat part (30103.dat) how can I (...) (17 years ago, 17-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | light.dat has wrong title
|
|
The part title for light.dat is as follows: Pov-RAY Light Source (useless to give a color to it) This title is wrong. Even the L3P that's been out for years pays attention to the color, and creates a light source that matches the given color. (...) (18 years ago, 6-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) I just don't want people confusing naming conventions in the part library with naming conventions in Linetype 1 part references. I was mostly replying to Kevin saying his applications choke on spaces in part references, which is something I'd (...) (18 years ago, 4-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) You should also consider stripping trailing whitespace from the end of the filename. I believe MLCad and most of the other programs do this. Whitespace in filenames has been supported by many Ldraw programs for quite a while, but it does not (...) (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) I very strongly support allowing the inclusion of whitespace in LDraw filenames, provided the first character is not whitespace. Bricksmith has always allowed users to do this. When parsing a line, I get all the matrix numbers, skip all (...) (18 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? (scanf tricks)
|
|
(...) That's a nifty scanf trick. But don't forget, you might still want to (URL) trim leading and trailing whitespace> (tabs and space characters) from the parsed filename (and maybe even surrounding quotes). Don (18 years ago, 29-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? (scanf tricks)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Jim, Thanks! I'll use it. Kevin (18 years ago, 29-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature??? (scanf tricks)
|
|
(...) misparse file names with blanks or tabs in them. (...) will be backward compatible and not cause problems (at least not for (...) I have no idea whether this could be worked into your sscanf usage, but it is possible to read whitespace into (...) (18 years ago, 29-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) OK, that makes a lot more sense. LDView had the same problem with whitespace in filenames until I specifically added support for that. (LDView now gives you a warning when it encounters whitespace in a filename.) --Travis (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
|
(...) Sorry for posting to my own post. In particular if the "longer file names" cannot have blanks in the names, then there is no problem for LPub or LSynth. 20.3 would require no changes at to LPub or LSynth. Given that sscanf splits things up by (...) (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
