 | | Part x224: Windscreen 8 x 6 x 2 Curved
|
|
Peeron and Bricklink have this part under x224 but with no CAD image. But in the unofficial files on LDRAW.org, this part number refers to a piece of Technic rubber belt. Is anyone working on a DAT for this part? How do you resolve the conflict with (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Improved minifig heads [DAT]
|
|
(...) Here's the same file with the torus primitive included. The left over quads you're seeing are part of the subfile, 3626bs01.dat. I didn't do anything about that, since this is just an example. 0 FILE 3626bp01.dat 0 Minifig Head - Stud Hollow 0 (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Improved minifig heads
|
|
(...) I can't comment, because I don't have that torus file (t04o6250). However, the stuff left makes it look like the posted dat isn't correct even with the file. (Some of the geometry that I would have expected to be replaced by the torus is still (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Improved minifig heads [DAT]
|
|
Is there any interest in improving the minifig heads by using torus primitives? For some of the patterned heads, where there is printing on the curved section, it would be somewhat difficult, but most of them could be fixed pretty easily. Andy 0 (...) (21 years ago, 1-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) "Gonta" states clearly under the parts that they are to use freely. I have personally received requests for the wheels and tyres from others and have forwarded them on. These parts and others have been available from his site far quite some (...) (21 years ago, 30-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can I get a little help here?
|
|
I have made a few of my own parts that were not available. Start with the file that is close to what you want. open it in ldraw and modify it. save it as a new part in your models directory. Looks like you can modify the existing ladder and get (...) (21 years ago, 29-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Well the only problem that I have with that is that I don't think "beam" describes the short ones (1x2, 1x3) as well as "liftarm", (which I agree also isn't the perfect name). They are all basically the same shape, which is what I think led to (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) Yes, except that there is still nomeclature confusion elsewhere, some systems use Technic Bricks for the bricks with holes and some systems us Technic Beams, I believe. So I think the rounded designation is helpful. (...) except that the 1x2 (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
(...) I'm not sure that rounded is needed. Brick vs. Beam is very clear. Besides for bricks the count is the number of studs (always even except for 1). For Beams it is the number of holes (typically an odd number, except in the case of 1x2.) Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
Personally, I think the naming should be like this: For parts with axle holes, use the Liftarm designation e.g. Technic Liftarm 1 x 11.5 Double Bent for part 32009 and Technic Liftarm 1 x 3 Thin with Click Rotation Hinge Half Socket for part 41679 (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) Good question. In my view, all efforts to contact the author should be taken (and it sounds like you've been doing just that) but I am not sure that "snatching" a part, even one that's very rough and strongly desired and really only good for a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Snatch it?
|
|
hi folks, there are pics. at brickshelf (URL) some parts which have never been submitted to the PT. this site even contains the .dat file: (URL) some former investigation I ended up at the authors website: (URL) tried to contact "Gonta" through a (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can I get a little help here?
|
|
(...) (URL) could make a quick mock-up by shortening the current LDraw parts. But that wouldn't snap directly onto studs like the short version does. To make the part correctly requires changing the dimensions of the rails and rungs. A 1x2 stud (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming Technic Liftarms
|
|
Not sure if this has been brought up before, but the naming of the technic liftarms leaves something to be desired. It seems mostly the thin ones have just the dimensions, thick ones have "straight" appended. Except for the 4L liftarms. Bricklink (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Can I get a little help here?
|
|
Has anybody made the following parts? Tile 2 x 2 with Gauges Pattern (3068bpx4) (URL) Hull Floating 8 x 22 x 2 1/3 Complete Assembly (x499c01) (URL) can anyone modify these parts to make the two-section ladder that is twelve studs long? (URL) in (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 3839a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with Handles - Type 1 is wrong
|
|
This part should have 'handles' that are slightly longer than two studs, see (URL) This is not reflected in the LDraw part. Tim (21 years ago, 26-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Modulex\lin0112.dat - Modulex (R) Modulex Lintle 1 x 12 [DAT]
|
|
0 Modulex (R) Modulex Lintle 1 x 12 0 Name Modulex\lin0112.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 REM Scale it down to 0.625 if using together with original LEGO 0 REM Peeron x723 - Modulex Lintle 1 x 10 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 2.5 -10 120 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 1 0 (...) (21 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\b010104a.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20 [DAT]
|
|
0 Modulex (R) Brick 1 x 1 x 4 with Grille 0 Name: Modulex\b010104a.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 REM Scale it down to 0.625 if using together with original LEGO 0 REM Peeron x724 - Modulex Brick 1 x 1 x 4 with Grille 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 2 24 10 0 10 10 (...) (21 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Modulex is designed on a 1x1x1 cube, different from System dimensions. They were never designed to integrate into the Lego system. It would be very unlikely, and certainly unintentioned, if a Modulex part fit a System brick. (...) That is how (...) (21 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BBB wheels
|
|
(...) Yes, they are. They might work as a stand-in, though. ++Lar (21 years ago, 21-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
