 | | I can't load my new files...
|
|
...Because someone took my part numbers. Well over a year ago (closer to two years ago, if memory serves), I was given the range of x460 through x489 for any LDraw file I wrote whose part number I didn't know. (These are called "temporary part (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) OK, I see the problem. (...) This is a good idea. So I would agree with that. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to agree, as I have been struggling with this conceptual problem, since borrowing a selection of Modulex with the intention of authoring some parts for LDraw. Are there any Modulex parts that _do_ actually bind with regular LEGO? (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Have you really considered the consequenses when modelling? It will be almost impossible to calculate the positions of the parts. Or at least very, very time consuming. /Tore (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I think the scale of Modulex parts should hardcoded (62.5% of normal size in dat-code). No separation. So it has the same norm as the "normal" Lego parts (1 mm = 2.5 LDU). CU Bernd (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Sorry, wrong ng... :) FOT: lugnet.cad.dat.parts (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing the research. As a result, I think "Chin Guard" is preferable. Chris (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
<all the stuff I agree with snipped, leaving only the trivial> (...) I agree with the idea, but is "Chin-Guard" a standard word? It's not in either dictionary.com or m-w.com (I really need to get my books out of storage. . .) and a Google search on (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I can go along with that! ;) (Good catch, by the way! ;) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I agree and prefer Chin-guard too. (...) Doh - no, of course not. I meant 193a : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thin Chin-guard 193b : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thick Chin-guard (...) Chris (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) So, by your own logic, the classic helmets should be: (...) (I personally think the above makes more sense, incidentally. None of the helmets have chin straps, because that would have to go under the chin.) On a side note, are those supposed (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'm partial to Chin-Guard. A chinstrap is a miniature belt that braces itself against your chin to hold your helmet onto your head. A chin-*GUARD* on the other hand protects your chin. (...) I like the inclusion of Castle. But we should (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) And they lived happily ever after... :-)))) (...) Chin-Guard or Chinstrap? (...) suggestion: x527 - Minifig Helmet Castle with Chinstrap and Wide Brim (...) w. (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'd like to reach closure on this in preparation for the next parts update. I have re-thought my decsion about 193+593 vs. 193a+193b, mainly in the light of the Classic Window discussion, where we are allowing suffices on 3DNs. And I also take (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Perhaps the above mentioned (and other similar) parts would best be called "wedge plates". Wedge due to the shape and plate due to the thickness. There is such a variety of shapes and shapes there will always be exceptions to whatever (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3 new primitives for Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
I forgot to include the three new primitives, I created for the Technic Link Chain Old: 3-8ring1.dat 3-8ring5.dat 3-8rin12.dat 0 Ring 1 x 0.375 0 Name: 3-8ring1.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 4 16 1 0 0 0.9239 0 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Link Chain Old 0 Name: x.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp <nkp@dds.nl> 0 Unofficial Element 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 rect.dat 1 16 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 0 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 8.5 7.5 16 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) By this metric, (URL) not a wing. That's reasonable. If 2413 were a wing, then so would (URL) they are the same shape, essentially. (...) I agree. There are, however, times when that is not possible---for example, (URL) undoubtedly similar (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Another point to consider in differentiating between a wedge and a wing. IMHO a wing is not symmetrical and has a matching counterpart (left & right) and would be inherently thin. I cant imagine building a plane model with a wing as thick as a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: curved monorail track
|
|
(...) I know, this is a late reply, but I've finished it. The "Monorail Track Curve Quarter" (2672) is at the tracker now. (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
