 | | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) I'm not *against* such a change, but I'm not a big supporter of it. Maybe if we could revive the old primitives committee (you all know who you are), or if there was another admin for the PT who could oversee this project, that would be a good (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) I wasn't thinking of either, really. I was wondering if maybe the part should be modeled without any primitives at all. I suppose the practical result of that would be primitive-inlining. (...) In the case of the lower arm (forearm), I don't (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Wow! This is so cool! These cooperating type 5 control points give us both first order continuity between the cylinder and the tangent plane, AND 2nd order continuity between adjacent cylinder parts. All with just a few small changes to a (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: SW Storm trooper and R2_D2 [DAT]
|
|
(...) I got this from the UCS Xwing posted a while back. It's primitive but it's a start 0 FILE astromec.dat 0 Pitiful attempt at R2-D2 0 Name: astromec.dat 0 Author: Dirtman 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines [DAT]
|
|
Well, based on comments in some other threads, I came to the conclusion that the type 5 lines I had around the edge of my original primitive where wrong. I have now updated them accordingly. This version is the same as the last other than that. The (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
Well, I know this discussion happened a while back, but I think I have solutions to all of the stated problems, thanks in part to an observation (...) same way as the quarter-cylinder primitive. Specifically, it is missing the final type 5 line. (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
(...) OK, then someone needs to document that in the files... (For ex.: "0 2002-05-05 MK converted triangles to quads to save space") Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: SW Storm trooper and R2_D2
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about the R2 in that shot, but the storm trooper helmet doesn't look like it started out as a DAT. The curved surfaces all look smooth, which is impossible to do with DAT files (at least with free-form curves). --Travis Cobbs (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | SW Storm trooper and R2_D2
|
|
Does anybody know where I may find the DAT files for the storm trooper helmet and the R2-D2 body and head. They are pictured here: (URL) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Daniel (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines
|
|
(...) Looks good to me. Just yesterday I added type 5 lines to your low res version and submitted them to the tracker. The diference in my version though that I moved the type 5 lines from the very edges of the sphere into the higher 2-8, 4-8, and (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
(...) I combined the triangles into quads so they save a bit of disk space. It may not seam like much of a savings, but I try to cut out every last bit I possibly can. (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines [DAT]
|
|
Well, I finally got around to adding the line type 5 lines to my high-res sphere primitive. (This thanks to the fact that Don Heyse incorporated code from LDGLite to draw them in LDView; thanks Don!) My sphere primitive isn't the same layout as the (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
Steve, According to the header info for these files, they were released in the most recent update. And yet, you've uploaded new versions of them? What's up? (URL) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) Well, it can matter, but isn't likely to in a LDraw renderer. It would matter if the program ever became fill-rate limited, but that usually won't happen, except with very simple models. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Update: 3939p91.dat - Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Logo Pattern Large [DAT]
|
|
0 Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Logo Pattern Large 0 Name: 3939p91.dat 0 Author: Willy Tschager 0 Unofficial Element 0 CATEGORY Slope 0 KEYWORDS space, galaxy explorer, space cruiser, 0 Slope 33 3 x 6 2 24 56 24 6 44 24 6 2 24 44 24 6 44 (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3596P90.dat - Flag on Flagpole with Classic Space Logo Pattern [DAT]
|
|
hi folks, I'll submit the part to the pt as soon as someone gives me a superhint for the following problem: as you can see on this pic. (URL) the original sticker in the 6970 Beta-1 Command Base is kept in a dark blue. it's definitely not the (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) have (...) Are you suggesting that there is (should be) a command to prevent primitive substitution, or that the primitive should be inlined? (...) Agreed. What I was more thinking of is the situation (in the minifig arm) where one region is (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) I think we should move to using the 4-4ringX nomenclature. a) Copy RINGx.DAT (x=1,2,3,4,7) to 4-4RINGx and RING10.DAT to 4-4RIN10.DAT, replacing with ~moved-to files. b) Make the PT reject new submissions that use the old names? c) Automated (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) That makes me feel better, becuase I was the one who submitted those two primitves. We should probably come to some sort of FORMAL decision as to wether to use the old ringX name or move them all into 4-4ringX primitives. (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) Sorry, it was a false alarm. There are no duplicated primitives. AFAIK. Steve (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
