 | | Re: New Part, 99% done: 6203.dat - Container ???
|
|
Well, I know this discussion happened a while back, but I think I have solutions to all of the stated problems, thanks in part to an observation (...) same way as the quarter-cylinder primitive. Specifically, it is missing the final type 5 line. (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
(...) OK, then someone needs to document that in the files... (For ex.: "0 2002-05-05 MK converted triangles to quads to save space") Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: SW Storm trooper and R2_D2
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about the R2 in that shot, but the storm trooper helmet doesn't look like it started out as a DAT. The curved surfaces all look smooth, which is impossible to do with DAT files (at least with free-form curves). --Travis Cobbs (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | SW Storm trooper and R2_D2
|
|
Does anybody know where I may find the DAT files for the storm trooper helmet and the R2-D2 body and head. They are pictured here: (URL) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Daniel (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines
|
|
(...) Looks good to me. Just yesterday I added type 5 lines to your low res version and submitted them to the tracker. The diference in my version though that I moved the type 5 lines from the very edges of the sphere into the higher 2-8, 4-8, and (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
(...) I combined the triangles into quads so they save a bit of disk space. It may not seam like much of a savings, but I try to cut out every last bit I possibly can. (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines [DAT]
|
|
Well, I finally got around to adding the line type 5 lines to my high-res sphere primitive. (This thanks to the fact that Don Heyse incorporated code from LDGLite to draw them in LDView; thanks Don!) My sphere primitive isn't the same layout as the (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | why re-submit x-4disc files?...
|
|
Steve, According to the header info for these files, they were released in the most recent update. And yet, you've uploaded new versions of them? What's up? (URL) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) Well, it can matter, but isn't likely to in a LDraw renderer. It would matter if the program ever became fill-rate limited, but that usually won't happen, except with very simple models. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Update: 3939p91.dat - Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Logo Pattern Large [DAT]
|
|
0 Slope Brick 33 3 x 6 with Classic Space Logo Pattern Large 0 Name: 3939p91.dat 0 Author: Willy Tschager 0 Unofficial Element 0 CATEGORY Slope 0 KEYWORDS space, galaxy explorer, space cruiser, 0 Slope 33 3 x 6 2 24 56 24 6 44 24 6 2 24 44 24 6 44 (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3596P90.dat - Flag on Flagpole with Classic Space Logo Pattern [DAT]
|
|
hi folks, I'll submit the part to the pt as soon as someone gives me a superhint for the following problem: as you can see on this pic. (URL) the original sticker in the 6970 Beta-1 Command Base is kept in a dark blue. it's definitely not the (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) have (...) Are you suggesting that there is (should be) a command to prevent primitive substitution, or that the primitive should be inlined? (...) Agreed. What I was more thinking of is the situation (in the minifig arm) where one region is (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) I think we should move to using the 4-4ringX nomenclature. a) Copy RINGx.DAT (x=1,2,3,4,7) to 4-4RINGx and RING10.DAT to 4-4RIN10.DAT, replacing with ~moved-to files. b) Make the PT reject new submissions that use the old names? c) Automated (...) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) That makes me feel better, becuase I was the one who submitted those two primitves. We should probably come to some sort of FORMAL decision as to wether to use the old ringX name or move them all into 4-4ringX primitives. (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) Sorry, it was a false alarm. There are no duplicated primitives. AFAIK. Steve (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x176
|
|
(...) Shhhh! We don't [buy] want the masses to realise [more] that ldraw.org is really a [technic] front for a fearfully powerful [lego] money-making machine! (...) Well done! I don't think they suspect anything at all, do you? FUT: .o-t.fun ROSCO (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) ????? Just out of curiousity, what are these two? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) I understand that. But the question specified that the number of triangles (actually polygons, but feel free to assume triangles) is fixed. (...) So size of the polygons doesn't matter. Hmm. I'll have to remember that. Steve (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) I don't know about all situations (POV, etc), but for real-time rendering in OpenGL, the fastest rendering generally occurs with the fewest number of triangles (assuming that the triangles specify the same final geometry). The fact is that (...) (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. We usually stick with units of 1 because they're the most easily scaled, and most easily implied (ie, if every ring has a n:(n+1) ratio of radii, we don't need to state both radii in the filename). OTOH, boxes have side length (...) (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
