 | | high res bushlocks?
|
|
I think that the bushlock primitves should be updated to align with the 48 segment primitves. What do others think? (22 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Mark Chittenden wrote: --snip-- (...) Ahh, that's perfect! Just what I needed, thanks. :) Nothing too detailed and overdone, just makes it look like people aren't drinking from empty glasses. :) Thanks a ton for helping. If (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
(...) Whipped up a simple "filler" piece for the goblet. Fills the goblet to 3/4's full. Works best as a solid color in a translucent goblet. Here's a pic, the part will be available via my Brickshelf folder when it passes moderation. The goblet on (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw Part Request - Goblet Fill
|
|
I was hoping someone could help me out with this. I'd do it myself, except I don't have the skills yet. I'm looking for something to fill the castle goblet. It needs to look right for a drink inside the goblet (this means maybe even not up to the (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
Hi, I have included Anton Raves POV-code in to my 590 file. See the difference here: (URL) (LDraw) (URL) (Raves) Jeroen "Mark Riley" <markril@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Hy6FL6.13JH@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) classic (...) on top (...) (...) (22 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
(...) Also, I notice the technic pin on the bogie plate is shorter than it should be - the dat file has it as 12 LDU tall when I measure the actual pin to be 14 LDU tall. I think Ryan may have been alluding to this when he talked about the height (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9v train motor - 590.dat
|
|
(...) Hi Ryan, I just saw that your posting is 4 years old. And during all this time noone has ever fixed this bug in 590.dat And I'm sure it is a bug! Here is a picture that shows what is wrong with this part: (URL) I hope that after all this time (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | looking for a part
|
|
Hi everyone, I'm looking for a part as a dat-file (URL) Does this part exist? And if yes - where can I find it? TIA Sven (22 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Looking for Roborider parts
|
|
Has anyone modeled or made a workable mockup of part #32306 Technic Liftarm 3 x 7 x 2 Fork 3 Fingers and the Technic Disc 5 x 5 that are used as wheels? (22 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) Roof ...'. Especially since the big sloped panels (30156) fit so nicely with 6121. They should be grouped together. (...) Yes, totally agree. Steve (22 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone modelled the 4492 yet ?
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's mine, done with mockups of the new wedge plates. The plates on Parts Tracker are better, and since I used the correct part numbers, easy to replace my mockups with the PT versions. Doesn't have the binoculars (left that off due to (...) (22 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, FTX)
|
| |
| | MOC: cannon70.ldr - Firing Cannon From the 70's [DAT]
|
|
So you think that firing cannons is something new in the wonderful world of LEGO. Well, you're wrong. Here's an LDraw model file of the cannon that killed so many maxifigs in the awful battles back in the late 70's... How it wored? Just remove the (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Lsynth
|
|
Thanks a million! Jeroen "Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Hxtw6r.7FC@lugnet.com... (...) file as a (...) blue (...) constraints (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) This part has no figure 8 cross sections either. The horizontal (ie parallel to the Y=0 plane) cross sections all terminate with the normal to the curve at right angles to the open face and the widest part of the cross section is always at the (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I said idealised, not standard. (...) I am sure they did. But they didn't make things that had figure eight cross sections much of the way up, if I am not much mistaken. (...) It is more than that, it is a quarter of a *cylinder*, a geometric (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with Lsynth [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Jeroen, LSynth does not recognize L520.DAT and L521.DAT as constraints. I was able to synthesize a hose like this: 0 Untitled 0 Name: lsynth2.ldr 0 Author: jeroen de haan ( info@digitalbricks.nl ) 0 Unofficial Model 0 SYNTH BEGIN (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) parts (...) actual (...) According to my dictionary a dome is any curved or vaulted roof. It does not have to be circular, or even regular. The fact that something doesn't exist in reality is hardly a reason to reject a name for what is a toy. (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I would argue that two parts back to back make something that is not an actual dome, but rather some shape never seen in reality. (...) I would disagree, it is in fact highly relevant. If I take an idealised onion dome and divide it in half, I (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
I would have to disgree. The part is half a dome - it takes two parts to make a complete dome, therefore one part is only half of the dome. The fact that the resulting shape is not half of a circle is largely irrelevant IMHO. Even if you remove the (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Onion Dome (part 44511) from Orient Expedition sets
|
|
(...) I am not so keen on "half" because it's not really exactly a half of a dome, it's rather more than half. (put two back to back to see what I mean). I'd support calling it "partial" or something like that. Or even "facade" since I think the (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
