 | | x467s01 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
One of three subfiles... 0 ~Minifig Book (Front/"Male" Half) -- Minus Surface 0 Name: s\x467s01.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 17 0 -1 17 0 0 0 0 27 0 3 0 box5.dat 0 4 16 33 -26 2 33 26 2 33 26 4 33 -26 4 4 16 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x466s01 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
One of three subfiles... 0 ~Minifig Book (Spine) -- Minus Surfaces (x1/4) 0 Name: s\x466s01.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 4 16 -5 -27 -1 -5 0 -1 -5 0 0 -5 -27 0 4 16 -2 -27 -2 0 -27 -2 0 -27 -1 -5 -27 -1 4 16 -5 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | I can't load my new files...
|
|
...Because someone took my part numbers. Well over a year ago (closer to two years ago, if memory serves), I was given the range of x460 through x489 for any LDraw file I wrote whose part number I didn't know. (These are called "temporary part (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) OK, I see the problem. (...) This is a good idea. So I would agree with that. CU Bernd (23 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to agree, as I have been struggling with this conceptual problem, since borrowing a selection of Modulex with the intention of authoring some parts for LDraw. Are there any Modulex parts that _do_ actually bind with regular LEGO? (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Have you really considered the consequenses when modelling? It will be almost impossible to calculate the positions of the parts. Or at least very, very time consuming. /Tore (23 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I think the scale of Modulex parts should hardcoded (62.5% of normal size in dat-code). No separation. So it has the same norm as the "normal" Lego parts (1 mm = 2.5 LDU). CU Bernd (23 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Sorry, wrong ng... :) FOT: lugnet.cad.dat.parts (23 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing the research. As a result, I think "Chin Guard" is preferable. Chris (23 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
<all the stuff I agree with snipped, leaving only the trivial> (...) I agree with the idea, but is "Chin-Guard" a standard word? It's not in either dictionary.com or m-w.com (I really need to get my books out of storage. . .) and a Google search on (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I can go along with that! ;) (Good catch, by the way! ;) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I agree and prefer Chin-guard too. (...) Doh - no, of course not. I meant 193a : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thin Chin-guard 193b : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thick Chin-guard (...) Chris (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) So, by your own logic, the classic helmets should be: (...) (I personally think the above makes more sense, incidentally. None of the helmets have chin straps, because that would have to go under the chin.) On a side note, are those supposed (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'm partial to Chin-Guard. A chinstrap is a miniature belt that braces itself against your chin to hold your helmet onto your head. A chin-*GUARD* on the other hand protects your chin. (...) I like the inclusion of Castle. But we should (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: What'd Datsville look like?
|
|
(...) Holy Cow! You updated it. (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) And they lived happily ever after... :-)))) (...) Chin-Guard or Chinstrap? (...) suggestion: x527 - Minifig Helmet Castle with Chinstrap and Wide Brim (...) w. (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'd like to reach closure on this in preparation for the next parts update. I have re-thought my decsion about 193+593 vs. 193a+193b, mainly in the light of the Classic Window discussion, where we are allowing suffices on 3DNs. And I also take (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Perhaps the above mentioned (and other similar) parts would best be called "wedge plates". Wedge due to the shape and plate due to the thickness. There is such a variety of shapes and shapes there will always be exceptions to whatever (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Wine rack idea [DAT]
|
|
A building principle idea for making a oblique lattice type wine rack with tile size (thin) planks and brick wide spacing. Further expanation and pictures can be found in this tread: (URL) friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. 0 Winerack from Tiles 0 (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | 3 new primitives for Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
I forgot to include the three new primitives, I created for the Technic Link Chain Old: 3-8ring1.dat 3-8ring5.dat 3-8rin12.dat 0 Ring 1 x 0.375 0 Name: 3-8ring1.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 4 16 1 0 0 0.9239 0 (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
