|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> On the two "newer" (well...) versions of LDBoxer, I've abandoned the *.box
> extension and instead I use Parts\B\*.dat for boxed versions.
>
> Have you tried them yet? Maybe they don't have the same memory limits? I think I
> changed from Memo to CheckBoxList in most of my later LDraw exeriments and that
> it increased the capacity very much.
>
> http://home.swipnet.se/simlego/ldraw/ldboxer/ldboxer.htm
>
> /Tore
Holy Cow!
You updated it.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: What'd Datsville look like?
|
| (...) On the two "newer" (well...) versions of LDBoxer, I've abandoned the *.box extension and instead I use Parts\B\*.dat for boxed versions. Have you tried them yet? Maybe they don't have the same memory limits? I think I changed from Memo to (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
7 Messages in This Thread: ![What'd Datsville look like? -Orion Pobursky (29-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What'd Datsville look like? -Michael Horvath (29-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What'd Datsville look like? -Tore Eriksson (30-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What'd Datsville look like? -Travis Cobbs (30-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What'd Datsville look like? -Tore Eriksson (30-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What'd Datsville look like? -Todd Lehman (30-Jun-03 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|