 | | Re: Has anyone done this 1x2 decorated tile?
|
|
(...) (URL) Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Has anyone done this 1x2 decorated tile?
|
|
(URL) scan needs to be rotated a bit, but I have 2 more to use if that one doesn't work for me) I am not sure which theme this is from, I have a bunch... dunno the part number... However here is a scan of the back side maybe your eyes are better (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville RR new F7a F7b
|
|
(...) They are super! I too like to see them in Datsville. What is the MOC/Official LEGO model ratio? /Tore (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Information/Parts
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Andrew Westrate writes: snip (...) snip Thanks Andrew, that's one of the pieces I was asking about, now I can (at last) save a copy of an idea I had for re-rigging a ship and dis-mantle and re-use the blocks. Ken (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Information/Parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Here's a mockup I made for the rigging for an ldraw version of set 6270. 0 Rigging 100 x 60 x 538 LDU 0 Name: rigging.dat 0 Author: Andrew Westrate 0 Unofficial Model 0 Horizontal 1 16 -48 0 0 0 96 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 -46 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Information/Parts
|
|
(...) Snip (...) Thanks for the reply Orion, I had already seen those (and I think I might have already downloaded them), but what I was really looking for was the rope rigging or ratlines I think they are called. As for generating them myself (yeah (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Information/Parts
|
|
(...) Do you mean these? (URL) you mean the actual masts and lines then you'll have to generate these yourself -Orion (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Datsville RR new F7a F7b
|
|
this is the model i would like to have in datsille if it ever is continued. (URL) are the engines. the baggage and consist will be made later based on the 10022 and 10025 . i plan to make custom sticker parts for the cars. once the whole train is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Request for Information/Parts
|
|
Has anyone created the following parts, or is anyone considering making them ? 33215 Half cone roofpiece 6x8x9. 30274 Brick 2x3x3 with cutout and lion head. 6055 6x6x6 Castle wall corner. 30100 Panel double wall 3x6x6. If any are available I would (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville rev 013.
|
|
(...) Tore i can do a few LEGO based models for you. ie a few cars, ill add my rig, a few trucks, maybe a few vans. i have a favor to ask? ive done a few emd f7 models and i did one in a blue and white "datsville RR" whats the possibility it (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) Doing so would cause a problem with LeoCad which doesn't display primitives not included in a part. This is the case with flexible axles (created form primitives), they have to be created as part, then imported as new part in LeoCad library... (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) Actually, the part mentioned was in the Parts directory (it is an official part), so it would presumably be shrunk by L3P. As for the rest, I agree that making them primitives makes sense, but I'm not sure the part authors will agree. I guess (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) I think it would be reasonable to consider segments as primitives. Move them to the P folder. Then they will not be shrunk. End pieces are still considered as parts. I don't know how the curve generator works, but if it generates a new (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Datsville rev 013.
|
|
This version: Datsville Petrolium has got their signs, but still no hoses. Bjwgas.ldr = whole station _bjwgas5.ldr = pump Anybody? Jonathan writes: "If someone would like to add string of some kind, it should run from the end of the hoses (the end (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Viewing Datsville
|
|
(...) Thanks for the help! When (if) I get it working I'll make a post. Jimmy (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
(...) This sounds like a good idea to me, except for one thing: the 0 LDRAW_ORG lines are generated at release-time by the release script. Every type listed is determined by other data in the file, or about the file -- parts are in the /parts (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Viewing Datsville
|
|
(...) The main file is Town.ldr The subfiles of Town.ldr are 15 separate sections, unfortunately not as modular as the Moonbase Project for example, and Townpeep.ldr with some people and vehicles. I have made a map over the Town??.ldr submodels: (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Segmented parts (ie hoses and flex tubes)
|
|
Looking at some of the files generated using the new curve generator LDDesignPad plugin by Orion (as well as files generated by the EMacs macro it is based on), I noticed a problem when displaying with LDView (which might also effect L3P output). (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Viewing Datsville
|
|
(...) Is your Dasville renderable. I was looking through the files last night and nothing looked like the "main" file to render. The reason I ask is that I'm working on a program that will composite many different images into a single image. I'ld (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Viewing Datsville
|
|
(...) I have no ftp access to the Datsville pages, and I don't think I want that either. The hours I spend on renaming, inlining, extracing, and tagging Datsville files is mainly to make it easier for myself to use them. Then why do I publish the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
