| |
In lugnet.space, Paul Gyugyi writes:
> Very nice!
> I could follow almost every step.
> Some suggestions:
> 1) As others have said, use numbers rather than arrows.
Yes, that's a hard problem. I really would like numbers, but have yet to
find an easy way to do good-looking numbers and have them positioned well.
> 2) On some steps, the scale was too small, and I had
> trouble seeing exactly what bricks had been added. It's
> better to keep the same scale throughout, and clip off
> the edges of the image
I agree- but MLCAD doesn't easily do this. Would LDraw be better?
> 3) I find scrolling to be just as hard as clicking.
> In the sheets where you have two columns of instructions,
> I'd rather just see one column. Printed instructions need
> to do columns to save paper.
On anything but a really large monitor, you have to both click *and* scroll
for these instructions. What's worse, you have to scroll back up to click
the link for the next page. Ew! I definitely have to improve that.
> 4) Add a page of alternate models. I know that sounds like
> a lot of work, but a good set has a well-balanced selection
> of pieces.
Good point- the concept of a "set" was a key focus of the contest last year,
but not nearly so much this year.
Anyway, thanks for all the suggestions. I don't know exactly what I'll
implement, but I do appreciate the comments from everyone.
BTW, Paul- your site was an early inspiration (4 years ago, perhaps?) for me
getting started on doing a Lego site. Thanks for that too!
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
