 | | LDAO Modeler is awesome! —John VanZwieten
|
| | | I finally got around to using this for creating a part, and wow! It easily cut the time it took me 50%. Many thanks to Steve Bliss for this great tool. Now I've got to do a part where I could use the lathe function. Steve, any plans to include some (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LDAO Modeler is awesome! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) You used the Modeler for creating a part? Wow. I figured the limited direct-editing would make part-authoring sort of difficult. I haven't actually made any new parts since releasing LDAO 2. So maybe I'm missing out on something. (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Modeler is awesome! —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Steve Bliss wrote in message <36b0a994.19888233@l...et.com>... (...) tool. (...) Maybe what I'm calling the Modeler is not really the Modeler. I didn't find a "Modeler" button or tool, so I've assumed you were talking about using the Editor with (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Modeler is awesome! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Ah. That makes a lot more sense. Try selecting "Update Tool Menu" on the Options menu. This will update the Tools menu and the command buttons with the latest tools, one of which is the Modeler. Modeler is a lot like the Editor, except it's (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Modeler is awesome! —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | (...) a (...) sure (...) part. (...) which (...) I just now figured this out, and yes, I see why you call it limited. At the same time, it would be better than the editor for doing models. The enhanced editor is what is great for part creating. Try (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LDAO Modeler is awesome! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I'm glad to hear you say that--I sometimes wonder if it was worth having both functions. At least I can share a lot of the code between the two. (...) I just get lost on the underside details. Something about having highly detailed concave (...) (26 years ago, 29-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
