Subject:
|
Yet another Datsville update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:37:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
430 times
|
| |
|
|
I finally got POV to work again, so check out the latest at
http://www.lugnet.com/cad/datsville/
or http://www.geocities.com/heartland/fields/1864/datsville.html . The
overhead image map can only be viewed at the geocities site.
I updated the POV file download, too, so anyone who would like to take a crack
at their own renderings, go for it. I recommend running first at quality = 0,
so that you can get the camera positioning just right w/o waiting hours for
rendering. If you would like your renderings added to the Datsville page,
email me (jpegs only please) and I'll try to get them up.
The major thing currently missing from Datsville are people! I'd really
appreciate it if a bunch of you could make a few custom minifigs and send them
to me.
Enjoy,
-John Van
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Yet another Datsville update
|
| John VanZwieten: Nice with a new update, but ... It looks like I messed up the colour of the windscreen on my mail van. It should be transparent light blue (41) and not transparent dark blue (33). - It's not a spaceship you know. Play well, Jacob (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: Yet another Datsville update
|
| One, problem that you haven't fixed is that on the right(northbound) one way street, the stoplight is facing in the wrong direction. You would either have to have the post on the other side of the street. Ryan. ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: Yet another Datsville update
|
| (...) I noticed you had trouble trying to apply the walk signals. Because of that I am re-submitting the Texas Traffic Signal with upgraded instructions (and 2 walk signals conjoined at the pole.) (...) In that case, you'll be getting people, goin' (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: Yet another Datsville update
|
| (...) Looks good! A couple comments about the landscaping: 1) If you increase r_l (or whatever I called the length of the river) the turns won't be quite so sharp. 2) I know it adds to rendering time, but turning the fog on for the non-overhead (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
