Subject:
|
Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:57:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10620 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> > Not every part number that is used in the LDraw System of Tools is listed on
> > Bricklink, so the check for the partnumber is useless.
> >
> > So at a result I do not feel that this would be of much benefit for
> > 1) Part authors
> > 2) Reviewer
> >
> > If somebody can convience me that I am wrong, please do so and I'll add that
> > function.
>
> I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that
> if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as
> the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely
> related to each other than BrickLink and ldraw.org.
>
> --Travis
You are right, but also with Peeron the above mentioned problems still exists.
So using Peeron will not be an option either.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
| (...) I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
