Subject:
|
Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:20:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10358 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> Not every part number that is used in the LDraw System of Tools is listed on
> Bricklink, so the check for the partnumber is useless.
>
> So at a result I do not feel that this would be of much benefit for
> 1) Part authors
> 2) Reviewer
>
> If somebody can convience me that I am wrong, please do so and I'll add that
> function.
I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that
if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as
the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely
related to each other than BrickLink and ldraw.org.
--Travis
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
| (...) My main source for names is Peeron and I use BL only if there is no Peeron reference. Nonetheless I don't think that naming should be automated: * Peeron has no limit on characters * It has no scheme for pattern, component parts, shortcuts, (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
| (...) Thank you very much for your feedback. If you follow the discussions made on the parts tracker then you would see that the description that bricklink uses is not in every case a choice that pass the parts tracker certifying process. If ever, I (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
