Subject:
|
Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:31:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10705 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> > Not every part number that is used in the LDraw System of Tools is listed on
> > Bricklink, so the check for the partnumber is useless.
> >
> > So at a result I do not feel that this would be of much benefit for
> > 1) Part authors
> > 2) Reviewer
> >
> > If somebody can convience me that I am wrong, please do so and I'll add that
> > function.
>
> I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that
> if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as
> the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely
> related to each other than BrickLink and ldraw.org.
>
> --Travis
My main source for names is Peeron and I use BL only if there is no Peeron
reference. Nonetheless I don't think that naming should be automated:
* Peeron has no limit on characters
* It has no scheme for pattern, component parts, shortcuts, different typs of
the same part.
w.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
| (...) Thats correct and also do not forget that LDraw has its own numbering scheme and Peeron may change their numbers if an LDraw part is released. It might be possible to get the names as a reference or an idea but I think also everybody has a (...) (15 years ago, 1-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
| (...) I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
