Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org TLG models
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:34:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
On 4/9/99, at 12:03 PM, John VanZwieten wrote:
> I've got all the M:tron models, all parts and minifigs included. Most have
> subfiles for each section which is "movable." Should we have a standard
> format for the respository? Ldraw only? LDLite expanded command set? .MPD?
> Multi-file or inlined?
I don't think we should have models with Ldlite commands because that way they
are not viewable in Ledit. Also in the models I don't think that it is necessary
to have step files where TLG does, or even at all. I have never used MPD, what
exactly is it? I make and view(when I'm building an actual model) all my models
in Ledit and I use LDAO and am always using the inline tool. I'll let the others
decide on the moveable sections problem. I think though that if we are using the
zip format fo downloading than that would be OK.
Ryan
"Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw.org TLG models
|
| (...) You should use either MPD or LDLite meta-commands. Neither of these is directly viewable in LDraw, but either will support rotatable parts in a single file. MPD is probably more "LDraw-compatible", because you can use MPDSplitter to parse an (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org TLG models
|
| I've got all the M:tron models, all parts and minifigs included. Most have subfiles for each section which is "movable." Should we have a standard format for the respository? Ldraw only? LDLite expanded command set? .MPD? Multi-file or inlined? (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
