To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 14010
14009  |  14011
Subject: 
Re: Hangin' around
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:55:57 GMT
Viewed: 
1715 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
   In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
   On the topic of jpegs, if you convert them at high enough quality (I use -quality 90% setting from IM convert) I think they can actually look better than lossless images because the compression rounds off some of the harsher lines in the renders. I switched to using jpegs for all my wallpapers quite a while ago and keep the png format for any further manipulation.

In my experience JPEG versions of computer-generated pictures only really look good when you turn off color sub-sampling during the JPEG compression. Many (most?) programs that allow you to create JPEG images don’t support this option. It also doesn’t seem to have a consistent terminology. In Irfanview, check the “Disable color subsampling” option in the JPEG save options box. In ACDSee, I think it’s something like 1x1 sampling vs 2x2 sampling.

One of the below images used color subsampling. The other didn’t. Can you tell which is which? (Note that I created PNG crops of the original JPEG images.)



Notice in particular the red edge lines, and how much more crisp they are in one of the images. Note that both images were saved with quality set to 90%. The subsampled original image was 45KB. The other was 57KB. The original PNG was 50KB, but the full original had a lot of white background, and PNG does a much better job on this than JPEG.

One thing to note is that even though many programs don’t support generating JPEG files like this, all JPEG viewers should support displaying them.

--Travis

Hi Travis,

I didn’t realise that you could switch off parts of jpeg compression. Very handy to know. I didn’t quite spell it out in my previous post but I actually meant for raytraced images rather than general renders. For edge-lined renders like ldglite or ldview generate I wouldn’t use jpeg because of what the compressed Fourier transform does to the edges. However since a raytrace is meant to be a simulation of the real world and jpeg is designed for real world images I find that it works fine.

Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hangin' around
 
(...) In my experience JPEG versions of computer-generated pictures only really look good when you turn off color sub-sampling during the JPEG compression. Many (most?) programs that allow you to create JPEG images don't support this option. It also (...) (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

16 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR