To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 12342
12341  |  12343
Subject: 
Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:26:17 GMT
Viewed: 
3785 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Sven Moritz Hein wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> 
> > I agree that other programs can't be expected to support something they aren't
> > aware of
> 
> I also agree.
> I think it wasn't very good to change the definition of a IMHO very complicated,
> but important meta-command like 0 GHOST.
> 
> Perhaps it would be better just to add the 0 GHOST in front of EVERY line which
> is ghosted, including the lines between 0 MLCAD SKIP_BEGIN / 0 MLCAD SKIP_END.
> Perhaps you could do this automatically (and implement this in a future version
> of MLCAD). Viewers which only show the complete MOC without steps (like LDView)
> could just skip the ghosted lines as if they weren't there. And the problem that
> there are also lines which shall NOT be ghosted between SKIP_BEGIN and SKIP_END
> (in springs, for example) would disappear.
> And last but not least there would not be any downward compatibility problems.

A agree.  I think that is an excellent idea, and the proper solution.

> 
> I know, MLCad is Michael Lachmann's program, and he decides what he wants to
> implement in it, but as long as the LDRAW language is to be extended, important
> changes should be mentioned here at LUGNET.

Michael has done so much for LDraw, and his ideas are great, and I find that
they add so much to the tool set of publishing MOCs that I prefer to implement
them.  I'm a pretty unsophistocated MLCad user, and typically learn about the
really cool parts (e.g. buffer exchange) through input from users like you Sven.

Please keep the input coming.

> 
> For me as a virtual MOC builder it would be fine if all programs interpreted the
> file the same way. But that does not mean that as soon as anyone adds a command,
> all other programs also have to use it. That's impossible (and maybe even not
> what we want).

The powerful ones, like arrows is well worth the effort.  Implemementing it in
MLCad, rather than a library of parts, is brilliant.

> 
> Leg Godt
> -Sven

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it
 
(...) I also agree. I think it wasn't very good to change the definition of a IMHO very complicated, but important meta-command like 0 GHOST. Perhaps it would be better just to add the 0 GHOST in front of EVERY line which is ghosted, including the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR