To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 12342
12341  |  12343
Subject: 
Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:26:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1350 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Sven Moritz Hein wrote:
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:

I agree that other programs can't be expected to support something they aren't
aware of

I also agree.
I think it wasn't very good to change the definition of a IMHO very complicated,
but important meta-command like 0 GHOST.

Perhaps it would be better just to add the 0 GHOST in front of EVERY line which
is ghosted, including the lines between 0 MLCAD SKIP_BEGIN / 0 MLCAD SKIP_END.
Perhaps you could do this automatically (and implement this in a future version
of MLCAD). Viewers which only show the complete MOC without steps (like LDView)
could just skip the ghosted lines as if they weren't there. And the problem that
there are also lines which shall NOT be ghosted between SKIP_BEGIN and SKIP_END
(in springs, for example) would disappear.
And last but not least there would not be any downward compatibility problems.

A agree.  I think that is an excellent idea, and the proper solution.


I know, MLCad is Michael Lachmann's program, and he decides what he wants to
implement in it, but as long as the LDRAW language is to be extended, important
changes should be mentioned here at LUGNET.

Michael has done so much for LDraw, and his ideas are great, and I find that
they add so much to the tool set of publishing MOCs that I prefer to implement
them.  I'm a pretty unsophistocated MLCad user, and typically learn about the
really cool parts (e.g. buffer exchange) through input from users like you Sven.

Please keep the input coming.


For me as a virtual MOC builder it would be fine if all programs interpreted the
file the same way. But that does not mean that as soon as anyone adds a command,
all other programs also have to use it. That's impossible (and maybe even not
what we want).

The powerful ones, like arrows is well worth the effort.  Implemementing it in
MLCad, rather than a library of parts, is brilliant.


Leg Godt
-Sven

Kevin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it
 
(...) I also agree. I think it wasn't very good to change the definition of a IMHO very complicated, but important meta-command like 0 GHOST. Perhaps it would be better just to add the 0 GHOST in front of EVERY line which is ghosted, including the (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR