Subject:
|
Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:26:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1350 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad, Sven Moritz Hein wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
>
> > I agree that other programs can't be expected to support something they aren't
> > aware of
>
> I also agree.
> I think it wasn't very good to change the definition of a IMHO very complicated,
> but important meta-command like 0 GHOST.
>
> Perhaps it would be better just to add the 0 GHOST in front of EVERY line which
> is ghosted, including the lines between 0 MLCAD SKIP_BEGIN / 0 MLCAD SKIP_END.
> Perhaps you could do this automatically (and implement this in a future version
> of MLCAD). Viewers which only show the complete MOC without steps (like LDView)
> could just skip the ghosted lines as if they weren't there. And the problem that
> there are also lines which shall NOT be ghosted between SKIP_BEGIN and SKIP_END
> (in springs, for example) would disappear.
> And last but not least there would not be any downward compatibility problems.
A agree. I think that is an excellent idea, and the proper solution.
>
> I know, MLCad is Michael Lachmann's program, and he decides what he wants to
> implement in it, but as long as the LDRAW language is to be extended, important
> changes should be mentioned here at LUGNET.
Michael has done so much for LDraw, and his ideas are great, and I find that
they add so much to the tool set of publishing MOCs that I prefer to implement
them. I'm a pretty unsophistocated MLCad user, and typically learn about the
really cool parts (e.g. buffer exchange) through input from users like you Sven.
Please keep the input coming.
>
> For me as a virtual MOC builder it would be fine if all programs interpreted the
> file the same way. But that does not mean that as soon as anyone adds a command,
> all other programs also have to use it. That's impossible (and maybe even not
> what we want).
The powerful ones, like arrows is well worth the effort. Implemementing it in
MLCad, rather than a library of parts, is brilliant.
>
> Leg Godt
> -Sven
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread: ![Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Sven Moritz Hein (30-Dec-04 to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Kevin L. Clague (30-Dec-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Travis Cobbs (30-Dec-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Sven Moritz Hein (31-Dec-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Kevin L. Clague (30-Dec-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it: Little DOS program -Sven Moritz Hein (1-Jan-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Problem with MLCAD arrows in other programs - and how to solve it -Michael Lachmann (2-Jan-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|