 | | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) <snip> Isn't it a shock to download such a tiny program and have it do what it does so easily? If only all software were that simple. :-) -- Terry K -- BTW, cool chess sets. It sure will be nice when there are POV-Ray primitives for the cone (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) With professionally-printed instructions and all the Lego parts for the chessmen and board, I would, sure! Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Indeed! (...) Would you buy one if they were for sale? :-) (...) I was thinking that too, but I really can't complain...being able to automagically convert any .dat file to a .pov file is an incredibly cool thing, even if it does it so (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) BTW, you did see Lars reply to my question about L3P and the conic sections, right? So after the next update to L3P, you'll put the fix for the 1x1 cone into the following parts update, right? Steve (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Affirmative to both. Though, to be safe, you might want to prod my memory when the time comes. Question, do the other cones have that problem? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Okey-doke. (...) The problem is with the primitive being used. I used the 1-4con3.dat file, the translation of which is improperly written by L3P. Presumably, any part using this primitive will render incorrectly. Currently, there's only one: (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) I checked this part with L3P this morning. What I got was: (...) I can't find an error in these lines, except they zero out the y component to turn a conic into a ring. Does POV-Ray not work with this type of transformation matrix? (or: did I (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Good answer, but not the one I was looking for. :-) What I meant to ask is: do the current cones need to get the same/similar fix as the 1x1 cone? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Oh, definitely. Haven't looked at many cone parts in L3P, have you? The 3x3x2 cone especially needs extensive work. Steve (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) What? (DING DING DING DING DING going off in my head) Is the 3x3 cone available in LDraw yet? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) YHBT. Steve (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) ? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) You Have Been Trolled. (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x3 cone availability
|
|
(...) :-D :-D :-D Yah, I fell for it. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) Nope, that's why I asked you. (...) Good thing I read Sproat's replies first. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets
|
|
(...) I don't know if the other cones will be as easy to fix as the 1x1x1. But I think they will (the main complication would be if the conic surface was interrupted by some feature). (...) Too bad; that one was aimed at you. ;) Steve (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)
|
