Subject:
|
Re: Automatic unofficial part detection?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:08:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1238 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Allister McLaren wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> >
> > Would that then imply that while you were tinkering with an existing part, you'd
> > have to remove that line when first uploading to the Parts Tracker, and it would
> > get added back in as it got released into an update?
> >
> > Or am I misunderstanding this and it would only be for NEW parts, since any
> > revised part undergoing revision has an official part out there somewhere,
> > however obsolete?
> >
> > If so that simplifys things I guess. What about part renumbers though?
>
> One way to solve both these problems would be to include a comment line for each
> revision in the header.
>
> Eg. 0 Revision: Part renumbered from 1234.dat Date: 1.2.2004. Author: John
> Citizen
>
> When it becomes an official update simply swap out 'Revision' for 'Official
> Update' or whatever. Each revision gets added to the top of the header so as you
> scroll down you see the full revision history of the part.
>
> Too Cumbersome?
>
> Just my thoughts based on years of working with and revising CAD
> models/drawings.*
>
> Allister
>
> *for whatever it's worth, it's seems every company I've ever worked for has
> decided it's necessary to reinvent the revision procedure, and none of them are
> flawless.
We have an unofficial convention for change history in the headers, but that is
not necessary to keep track of versions - and can get a little unwieldy.
Since the advent of the Parts Tracker (for update 2001-01), new or amended
official parts automatically have, in the header
0 LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE YYYY-RR
where YYYY is the year and RR the parts release sequence within that year, eg
2004-01, which will be the next.
If a part does not have a line like this it is from before 2001-01, and would
get a line like this if it were ever updated.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Automatic unofficial part detection?
|
| (...) One way to solve both these problems would be to include a comment line for each revision in the header. Eg. 0 Revision: Part renumbered from 1234.dat Date: 1.2.2004. Author: John Citizen When it becomes an official update simply swap out (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
