 | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) For MLCAD it doesn't matter. Steve said that MLCAD worked fine with long filenames inside parts.lst. The only reason to put the short filename in is for other programs that might have problems with the long filename. And as long as mklist is (...) (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) Sounds easy, but I think nobody can read that short filenames that would appear in the MLCad list!? cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) If it's running in Windows, I think a backwards-compatible switch should use the Win32 API to get the short filename (with the ~1 at the end, usually, determined using PathGetShortPath) and use that in place of the long filename. --Travis (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) That would be good, I think. (...) Can you have two levels? Level One that still shows the warnings, but doesn't stop, and Level Two suppresses all warnings. (...) I'd keep the current line-format for all parts conforming to the 8.3 format, (...) (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.8
|
|
Just uploaded a new version. New in Version 2.0.8 (Released 27.09.2009) 1) Now detailed scan is disabled if any change has been made. (This was necessary, as detailed scan needs the line number.) 2) History Dialog made new. 3) If last line is only (...) (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Website slow
|
|
(...) I'd guess that this time there is a mass downloading of the newest parts update. Tim (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Tools that output SVG?
|
|
(...) I think it would be easier for you to just try it out for yourself, but here's a file: (URL) following is the gzipped version of the file: (URL) gzipped one didn't work for me in Firefox (3.5), but it worked fine in IE with the Adobe SVG (...) (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for
|
|
(...) One place to find it is in the 2009-01 parts update ((URL)) Martin James (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Looking for
|
|
I've got a set of instructions I need to finish up and the model includes 30663 Car Steering Wheel Large. I'm using the unofficial file at (URL) ; that page lists the only required subfile as p/t04i1765.dat Torus Inside 1 x 0.1765 x 0.25 , but the (...) (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Website slow
|
|
(...) The visitors are also spiders, bots and the rest of internet fauna. LDraw.org is hosted on a Peeron.com server. Last time we had been slow it was lack of memory: (URL) drop Dan a mail an see what can be done. w. LDraw Administration Team. (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New article on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) And in the other direction if I need to get back Meshlab data in LDraw world? (I have used stl2dat for that, but there might be better solutions?) Philo (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Website slow
|
|
Whis is LDraw.org so slow? Is someone hosting it from their home/work PC? Are there really that many visitors? -Mike (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New article on LDraw.org
|
|
(...) You can export as 3DS using LDView and then load the 3DS file in MeshLab. -Mike (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Tools that output SVG?
|
|
(...) Could you upload an example file? -Mike (15 years ago, 26-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) I could update the mklist sources to work handle filenames with 25 chars I was going to add a quietmode commandline option this weekend anyhow. Should I allow 25 chars as the default, and perhaps include an optional command line arg to (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) If I understand that, this would mean that we could use a new mklist tool and we can start using that long filenames. The possibility to use MLCad for generating PARTS.LST will be away, but this only a little cut. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) Were any other issues anticipated? (...) I did a short test of MLCAD with a modified PARTS.LST. The results were mixed - MLCAD seems OK using an altered-format PARTS.LST file, but re-generating PARTS.LST from MLCAD results in an invalid file. (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) When the LSC updated the spec to allow 21.3 filenames, I don't think any of us were aware that this would create a problem for PARTS.LST. However, looking at the file, there's a chance that MLCAD will work perfectly well with longer filenames (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) Parts Tracker-wise (if I remember right, and if nothing's been changed), there's only one script which needs to be modified to accept 21.3 files instead of 8.3 files. Organizationally, I dunno if there is actually a hold-up. The specifications (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) This is the status quo now for many months. What action has been taken to solve that problem? To me it seems only to be a little adjustment to some lines of code (but maybe I am wrong). So my question would be: where is the bottleneck that (...) (15 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
