 | | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) I agree that it shouldn't be held for this reason. As for the original question, I think that they should be modeled in the way that it appears they were "intended" to be if and only if at least one of the various copies of the part that show (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) - snippage - (...) I'll agree 85% with Matt. As a casual LDraw user, I'd love to see new parts being available more quickly, which might be done with a more streamlined process. What I agree with Matt about is perhaps redefining the level of (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) You know, this piece typifies the problem with the process and why no new parts get published, at least from my view. The burden of detail required for approval is too onerous. In this particular part the ice cream is fine either way - as the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
I had the same argument with Steffen about part 3010pt6.dat (URL) I have a few of these bricks and all of them show the pattern slightly off-center. Also online pictures of this brick seem to be identical. Therefore I created the digital version of (...) (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) Personally I prefer parts to look as they look not as they "should" look. Sometimes you can even use these imperfections to achieve good effects. Tim (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: (URL) do not agree with Steffen. I think we should try to be realistic. What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? cu MikeHeide (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Zach Best, accept this nominiation. (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
--snip-- (...) Not by hand... that's what Perl is for ;) Tim (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote: ... (...) ... I think having a direct link to the part would be a great idea. <shameless self-promotion> You could even include a .dat file that contains exactly one line: a reference to the part. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView SaveSnapshot bug
|
|
(...) Just as an update to this thread, I did track down a bug in LDView 3.0's command line processing of the -SaveSnapshot option that is likely responsible for the blank images you're seeing. That will be fixed in 3.1, and hopefully you'll then be (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(...) It seems that by default, Visual C++ expects some libraries to exist on the user's computer. I've compiled a static build instead, so hopefully it should work for everyone now. The fixed Windows binary is up on the site. Let me know if you (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) please consider that the part is available for download at the PT and you can have a closer look than an entire gallery of pics would allow. I could include the link to the part in the contest though (but I have to check back with orion (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) What about 4? Front, Top, Side and Iso Tim (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) I think it's a great idea to put the part authors in the spot light. But isn't one view a bit limited? Especially for the more complex / non symmetrical parts. Just my 2 cents :) Roland (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
Hi folks, the LDraw.org Administration Team would like to introduce a new contest. It will be called: POTM – Part Of The Month It is no news that programs get most of the spotlight and little goes to "the unsung heroes of the LDraw CAD world" - this (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad) !
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks guys, I accept -Orion (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Tim Gould, second this nomination. (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Willy Tschager, second this nomination (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Willy Tschager, nominate Orion Pobursky. w. (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks guys, I accept the nomination. Chris (18 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
