 | | Re: First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(...) Hi Bram, Some excellent algorithmic design there. Are you sure you shouldn't be doing combinatorics rather than engineering? A few questions about it: 1) Is the whole thing algorithmic or do you have to specify where your snot-centers (I see (...) (18 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | First SNOT spheres, now SNOT bunnies?
|
|
(URL) Click the pic for more info Here's some more examples of my software at work, rendered in POV-Ray: (URL) Here's how studs-out building compares to studs-up: (URL) Enjoy! --Bram (18 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.cad, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) Well, wow! Thanks to the SteerCo for recognizing my humble efforts to make the community better. While my ability to contribute has diminished over the last year or so, I'm still committed to making LDraw and LDraw.org a better (albeit at a (...) (18 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) I think this excerpt from a mail between me and someone else is the only written documentation: -8<---...--- BEGIN ---...--- I capture the mouse on a drag operation in LDLIST, and sends the following message to each window the cursor passes (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) Well done, Orion. Not only have you done a LOWBTS, but you've done a lot of very useful and visible stuff too, congratulations! ROSCO (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
|
(...) Given the nature of the topic, I would say a Freudian slip ;) - Jim F. (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) Congrats Orion! I'm sure it is a well deserved honor. - Jim F. (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) I forget too, but it looks like I didn't make any changes for the part count update. It's a pretty cool feature and I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to implement. And maybe I can make the cursor switch to a drop target as well. (It does it (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) A hearty congratulations to you Orion! Well deserved, to I must say! Kevin (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
|
(...) Nice catch! :-) JOHN (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
|
(...) "Combatibility?" Was that a Freudian slip, or an intentional Yogi Berra-ism? Either way, it's pretty funny. :) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) the future :-) Did you ever do any changes to make the response back so the part count in LDList is updated (or have we talked about this in email, and I'm forgetting even more?)? (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) Congratulations, Orion! (...) Good job, SteerCo! Steve (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) Yeah, I did this in ldglite a while back. You paste the peeron inventory in the ldglite window (with a ctrl-V in ledit mode) and it arranges the parts in a spiral so you can move them around and build the set. It's kinda fun, but a bit slow (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) The simplest way would be if peeron.com could serve a set inventory as an LDraw file - then you just load the set into MLCad and rearrange the pieces. As a side note, LDList ((URL) has the possibility to load a set description and only show (...) (18 years ago, 13-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
|
(...) We (the SteerCo) are in contact with the LDD team. My personal opinion is that the two are designed for different user-bases so combatibility is more important than helping them (or they us). Tim (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw - Thanks for the info
|
|
(...) Well gang, Thanks for all the input. I appreciate the views that were presented. I’ve noticed over the past few years that the cadding community has been producing some very nice tools. And now Lego has released there own (LDD). Is there a (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
(...) Congratulations to Orion. I think he is more than deserving. Tim (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2006
|
|
The James Jessiman Memorial Award was established by the Jessiman Family to honor an individual who has contributed to the furthering of LDraw, the DAT format, and James' memory. This year the LDraw.org Steering Committee is please to announce the (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LDD vs LDraw
|
|
(...) Try LeoCAD... it allows to rotate parts around their own coordinate axis ;o) Philo (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
