 | | Re: New tutorial: Running LSynth through MLCad's interface
|
|
(...) Willy, THanks so much for this tutorial. It is awesome that you put the work into it. Greatly appreciated. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I won't burden steve with work, but two simple checkboxes at the PT's submit page saying: # Be aware that by touching my parts you will have to face the entire italian mafia and end up in nice brand new concrete boots # I'm not Willy, fix them (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New tutorial: Running LSynth through MLCad's interface
|
|
Hi folks, generating hoses, chains and electical cabels has never been easier - even for people with little CAD experience. Check out this tutorial about MLCad's newest feature and go down to the nuts and bolts of the prog: www.holly-wood.it "Synth" (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I think you might be on to something. What's a good definition of ACTIVE? Some ideas I had: a) did activity x within the last y time periods (x could be any of authored, reviewed, participated in a discussion or other) or b) responded to the (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: License Question
|
|
(...) Well, my hope is twofold: I don't want the LDraw crew to have to accomodate my project under the official LDraw License, and I don't want to have to restructure my project to accommodate the official LDraw License! I don't expect it to be a (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: License Question
|
|
(...) This is just me speaking, no official standing in this post, but isn't this process very much like the "clean room reverse engineering" process used to circumvent IP by reinventing from scratch based just on the specs? Also these parts don't (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | License Question
|
|
Let’s say that some well-meaning individual created a large number of DAT-based parts representing the bricks of LEGO-compatible brands, including quite a few of the more “basic” elements, such as the 2x4 brick, the 1x2 brick, the 2x8 plate, etc. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what the history is here, but what happens to good parts that were almost completed, and need a few minor fixes, but the original author has no interest in it anymore? Should the part just sit in the PT forever? Should it be (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I was using Steve's word, but I believe we both meant it in the geeky sense of "should not exist", and not "is maliciously placed". Dan (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I think the key word here is 'active'. If the requirement is that some percent of the ACTIVE authors actually are for a change, wouldn't that work for both of you? Dan (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2nd LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thank you, Travis. I humbly accept the nomination. /Tore (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Quoting Yoda, "Hard to see, the future is". The ability to change the ShareAlike license is to hedge our bets against unforseen issues. If you are omnipotent (should I call you Q?), then you can see all forseeable issues and can (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: A Big Thank You To The LDraw Community
|
|
(...) COOL! So how do we get to play this game? Games made by uni teams are among some of my faves (Bontago is a current fave)... (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
(...) Hi Orion, You can use the preferences tool to change the resolution LDD uses. Open the tool (Start Menu -> LEGO Software -> LEGO Digital Designer -> Preferences) then select the user defined category, choose customize, and pick your resolution (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | A Big Thank You To The LDraw Community
|
|
I just wanted to send a big thank you to all the development members of LDraw and LDraw related tools. The Info: I was in 2nd Year computer systems at the British Columbia Institute of Technology. One whole course each term was dedicated to a big (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) Yuck! >:^( (...) Did you see this one? No light blue, bright white only on the right side overlap. (URL) (...) But look at the right edge of the rocket on this pic. You can clearly see the white is brighter where the light grey lines come in (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> wrote in message news:I0tAAp.FnI@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) current (...) notable (...) The documentation in the LDD installation directory mentions that you can run LDD in (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) Willy, I know how strong your feelings are about this particular subject but some don't feel this way. Is there some compromise that will allow both sides to be happy? -Orion (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) there is no way in getting me to agree to this clause if this also impleis that others may modify my work before it got certified. to make it clearer: no fixes to parts I submitted for the first time. (...) once if got official they might do (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Color scheme in Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern?
|
|
(...) (2 URLs) check this out. instead of 505 I just used a costum, dithered color with: 255 255 255 255 193 169 it is obvious to me that it's just a lack of LDraw colors ... (...) honey bunny, you are totally wrong on this side ;-) it's not at all (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
