 | | a simple idea for creating the bump effects on patterned slopes
|
|
how does this sound?: due to the fact that most patterned slopes arent in lgeo, maybe a pov code within the patterned parts to create the bump effect when exporting into povray. does this sound good? im guessing a good example would be using color (...) (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Question about creating Cone 4 x 4 x 3 for LDraw
|
|
(...) I happened to get me a seccond hand trainset 725, including two of these cones. So I have started on creating this part for LDraw. By looking at the orientation of the stud and the inner details it seems that this part was creating 45 degrees (...) (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: "Minifig Fire Helmet Breathing Hose"(x171)
|
|
(...) I am sorry to tell you that this part is currently not appear in MLCAD or LDRAW, you might try to use other parts to replace just as that avitor goggles (20 years ago, 30-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 10129 Rebel Snowspeeder
|
|
(...) Orion, Are either of the wedge parts you mentioned available, either officially or unofficially? Thanks. -Joel (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Povray boatwake
|
|
The rooster tail is great! The individual waves could be at a wider angle though. In safe boating classes they teach you that your wake spreads at about a 45 degree angle which you need to be aware of so that you don't "wake" vessels at anchor, on (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | "Minifig Fire Helmet Breathing Hose"(x171)
|
|
Hi. Does anyone have a LDRAW DATA of below parts? ; (URL) I'm trying to model my special task force "BrickHound" on MLCAD, so I need above part-data to make them actable through the night. ; (URL) you would have/know unofficial data of this part, (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Not a bad idea I guess. Not a bad idea at all. I'm comfortable with meanwhile making it clear by signature though. (basically, if a post is signed with all 5 of our names, it's official, else it's not) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Maybe there's a need for a Lugnet user "LDraw.org SteerCo" so members of the SteerCo don't have to continue posting such disclaimers. Maybe limit posting range to CAD tree (maybe even ldraw tree?) and maybe announce. ROSCO (Added (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Povray boatwake
|
|
(...) well my first idea was to create a plane in Cinema4d for a boat wake... actually heres all my ideas 1. 3d boat wake via c4d *downside = millions upon millions of pollies* 2. A simple image like the classic nautica box front wakes *Downside = (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW Updates: Documentation Plan
|
|
(...) Cool. Paul, I did get your mail with a suggestion, did you receive my reply? I'd like to talk to you about what areas you see lacking in documentation. One of the things I'd like to do is get back to the get started docs and revise them and (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDRAW Updates: Documentation Plan
|
|
(...) Thanks, Steve. I use MLCAD, so I'll run that routine. If folks who know of post-update processing requirements acn send them to me, I'll create and contribute a generic instruction document. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 BAYLUG/BAYLTC (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
What follows is my personal reply not offical position of SteerCo. (...) I agree. We missed this goal, and it is indeed important. (...) True. And sort of false. Sometimes (take the change in the 9V train wheelset recently) there is a need to have (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote: snip (...) Larry: I think you missed an important user goal. The user wants assurance that parts will not disappear from the library when it is updated. The user has typically invested a great deal (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Povray boatwake
|
|
(...) Nice water. (...) Have been working on this. I am trying to animate a podracer with simulated dust kicking up behind the engines. Would be very close to water spray. I have been working with "while" loops to simulate this. I need to do some (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Povray boatwake
|
|
(...) Very impressive! Can you do it all with Pov-Ray? ;) (...) Yep - it's too shiny. Turn down the reflectiveness and it'll be perfect. Maybe a little motion blur would be cool too. I know you can do that with MegaPOV (the unofficial patched (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: ANIMATED SPLINE
|
|
Here is a section of code: #declare HOSEANIMATE_dot_ldr = union { // Untitled // Name: HOSEANIMATE.ldr // Author: MLCad // Unofficial Model // ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" // ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 object { _4274_dot_dat matrix (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | ANIMATED SPLINE
|
|
Here is a test animation of a flex hose. Used a spline for the path of the hose. (URL) I am really starting to like splines. Enjoy Steve (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Povray boatwake
|
|
(...) Fantastic. Could be my monitor, but I get the feeling of the water is just about to freeze. It looks a little like this state just between liquid and solid. /Tore (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) The license draft included in my post was merely done to demonstrate that the language needed to license the people described is possible. I've condensed most of my points, and some new ones, into a new post that I've posted in reply to the (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
This is post to sum up my ideas before I pop off on holiday for a few days. 1) Consider making the license apply to more than just parts or the parts library. This would allow things like documentation or software to be distributed too. 2) I would (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
