| |
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> I need to go back through the post and read it more carefully before I respond
> in depth.
>
> However, quickly...
>
> Thanks for sharing another license draft, but we really *really* would like to
> get the intent agreed on before we go to drafts, so sharing drafts may be a bit
> premature at this point, and confusing.
The license draft included in my post was merely done to demonstrate that
the language needed to license the people described is possible.
I've condensed most of my points, and some new ones, into a new
post that I've posted in reply to the beginning of this thread.
Peter
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote: (snip) I need to go back through the post and read it more carefully before I respond in depth. However, quickly... Thanks for sharing another license draft, but we really *really* would like to get (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
