| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
(snip)
I need to go back through the post and read it more carefully before I respond
in depth.
However, quickly...
Thanks for sharing another license draft, but we really *really* would like to
get the intent agreed on before we go to drafts, so sharing drafts may be a bit
premature at this point, and confusing.
Refer back to the timeline/process part of the root post of this thread. We are
trying to be methodical about this, as previous attempts have foundered at least
in part (in my personal view) because we didn't have consensus on the goals
before drafting things.
Other than the one license or two issue (which I would argue is actually an
implementation issue) are there any concerns in the community with the intent as
documented? Anything too broad or too narrow? Any activity that should be
precluded that wasn't stated? Any activity that should be explicitly recognised
(at the intent level, not the implementation level) so it's not assumed to be
disallowed?
We're pretty sure we have the intent right as written. However maybe we missed
something.
(again, written as me, but with strong belief I'm capturing SteerCo thinking)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) The license draft included in my post was merely done to demonstrate that the language needed to license the people described is possible. I've condensed most of my points, and some new ones, into a new post that I've posted in reply to the (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) <snip> I've taken the chance to read the threads mentioned earlier in this thread. And I've made a version of the license (based on the previous Steve Bliss version) that handles both author->ldraw.org requirements and author->EndUser (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
