 | | Re: 4.5V Semaphore Signal
|
|
(...) No, the poles are glued to the baseplate. ROSCO (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 6-stud road baseplates with dark grey road pattern parts
|
|
6-stud road baseplates with dark grey road pattern parts (URL) straight (part 44336, set 4110) (URL) curve (part 44342, set 4109) (URL) junction (part 44341, set 4108) (URL) don't have the 6-stud crossroads (set 4111), so haven't modelled it, but it (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x224: Windscreen 8 x 6 x 2 Curved
|
|
(...) To expand on TWG's answer, LDraw.org doesn't coordinate with Peeron on unofficial part numbers. Once a file is officially released in LDraw, Peeron updates their database to use LDraw's number. There's a plan to have a coordinated numbering (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Improved minifig heads
|
|
(...) Yes, I'd say using torii when possible would be good. I don't think we need to start making fractional torus primitives to fill in gaps, but easy improvements are worth doing. To make really beautiful heads, you should model the parts directly (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
[Steve has a brilliant insight, and cross-posts to lugnet.loc.jp] (...) I tried to post a message on Gonta's board, but I don't think it worked (the translator wouldn't translate the posting-response page, it said there was too much text). I should (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.loc.jp)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) Because our general approach has been that contributions to LDraw.org must be made voluntarily. We are not going to pull stuff in from people without their knowledge. However, would it help at all if we could get someone fluent in Japanese to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5V Semaphore Signal
|
|
(...) On the real parts, do the poles separate from the baseplates? If they do separate, then this is a good solution. If they don't separate, then this isn't such a good solution -- the 'complete' part file should be just like the part you'd pull (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Accuracy of curved surfaces
|
|
(...) Generally, I create curved surfaces by using the appropriate primitives. Once I've got the primitive sized to create the surface, I inline it and clip out anything that falls outside of the desired surface. So I'd use the primitive to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) to see your example. If I can get it to work, great! Thanks, Dave! (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Orion, there's no need to apologize! I expressed an *opinion*, not everyone has the same opinion. Sorry if you read it as criticism of *you*. That was not my intention. The 'one style fits all' is perfect for MOTM, it levels the ground for all (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) MMLLT (My Mileage Looks Like This): (URL) { location 0.84*<-1500 ,-1500 ,-4000> sky -y right -4/3*x look_at <300, -150, 1300> angle 40 rotate <0,1e-5,0> // Prevent gap between adjecent quads focal_point <150,-50,-150> aperture 25 blur_samples (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) I'm mostly in the 5-45 range, probably depends on the model and intent of picture too. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Non-orthographic perspective renderings never seem to work for me. They always look like flat, rendered with artifical perspective rather than rendered objects seen in perspective. But YMMV, of course! Dave! (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
Hello Orion Well.. i think the renders turned out great and it shows each model in a neutral way. I know it is a lot of work to do these not to mention even the time you have to put in this. I still need the authors desire to show their model in the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | TrackDraw available for download
|
|
The TrackDraw alpha candidate v6 is now available for download at (URL) . Features and bug fixes are detailed in the Yahoo! group messages. The Yahoo! group is now open for anyone to join; no moderation required. The TrackDraw sources are available (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.trains, lugnet.town) !
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) No. I did after all post all this once before, so it's not that I didn't WANT to share it... (...) So fix your bug already! :-) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Since you're either lazier than I am, or you have an aversion to sharing, I did the search myself and found the your Mlcad view settings. :^) (URL) -A0.71,0,0.71,0.28,0...,0.39,0.65 -v4 to ldglite and pressing F12 gives these l3p camera (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) I'm coming around to that viewpoint as well... much easier to standardise. (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Actually the only one I use for instruction renders besides those is the "MLCad default view" which is a bit flatter (view point at a lower latitude) than the LDraw isometric view. All my POV camera angles are done purely by trial and error. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting now open for April's MOTM and SOTM contests
|
|
(...) Only if you use perspective. I think orthographic views are much more appropriate for MOTM. Don (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
