 | | Re: primer/tutorial on BFC? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I think it works just fine. L3Lab correctly detects that the matrix is mirroring, see View/Tree View... and click the BFC radio button, it should say INVERT in front of the line. When we discussed the BFC business the general assumption was (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: primer/tutorial on BFC?
|
|
(...) If this is the case then we need to go back through all the BFC'd parts and find instances of this type of matrix. Since L3Lab allows inverting the sign of the Y component and it's currently the only program to easily check for correct (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: primer/tutorial on BFC?
|
|
(...) L3Lab supports BFC INVERTNEXT. /Tore (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: primer/tutorial on BFC? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I do agree that it isn't supposed to work, because the BFC spec very carefully states that any polygons drawn with an aggregate matrix that causes mirroring must be flipped back. (...) I'm sorry that LDView is crashing your system, but it (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur parts
|
|
(...) The tail sections are in my to-do-bucket. But there are many, many parts with higher priority... /Tore (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Indeed but... too late now :-( (...) ...but using plates on side of liftarms can be very helpful to stiffen chassis built with them. Philo (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dinosaur parts
|
|
Hi all, is anybody working on these files? Animal Dinosaur Tail Section with Pin (URL) Dinosaur Tail Section End (URL) Dinosaur Head Small (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | December MOTM/SOTM Winners, January Voting Open
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the December Model/Scene of the month contests: MOTM, Gregory J Overkamp, Studliner Refuse Disposal Unit SOTM, John Miller, 1687 Transport Team Voting for the January 2004 Model of the Month and Scene of the Month (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) Thank you for this illustration. I see your point. These parts should have been originally modeled rotated 90 degrees around Z so that the liftarm "thickness" would have been the same a brick "width". I think I can safely say that I have (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Happy New Year 2004 - Library 500 is available now! And a new website too!
|
|
For those of you who don't visit my webpages daily, the new version 500 of my Lego library for POV-Ray is available now! The link to my webpages is: (URL) New Year! Anton (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I'll do it, but first I have to clean up this one: (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) are several of these liftarms getting changed to 18LDU? (...) Liftarms are narrower than bricks, you don't even need a caliper to see it : (URL) ...and measured with a caliper : brick width: 7.8mm liftarm width: 7.4mm liftarm height: 7.8mm As (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
(...) I agree. And the Pattern should be rebuild. In the moment it is converted with bmp2dat and so it needs some time to load the part in the preview. Also it doesn't look fine when you zoom in. CU Bernd PS: I don't own the part, so I can't rebuild (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Keyword in description missing
|
|
While we are at it, I think part 3754P01.DAT Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Picture should be renamed to Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with LL2079 Floating Astronaut Pattern Jaco (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I confirm Pauls measurement. I compared it with a brick and it has the same thickness. This is also needed to connect a pin with the holes. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) What are you using to measure with? I use a dial caliper. Paul (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: why I love subfiles...
|
|
(...) I'm going to have to agree with Tore on this one. Subfile are useful for repeated patterns and "without faces" parts, to me, your example seems to use subfiles uneccesarily. -Orion (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is the Thickness of Liftarms changing?
|
|
(...) I've measured these and several others have as well and we all got 18 LDU -Orion (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelling Pnuematics
|
|
(...) Great! I'll go and get it. (...) I've had a lot of success since my earlier post, I cut down the long tube part with bulged ends in LDDP and just used multiples of that. Thanks Steven (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Newbie question on printing b/w and colour hints
|
|
(...) Boy, that would be *very* hard to have happen automatically. Automatic placement of the color labels would be problematic at best. It is *much* easier to put the color labels in the part list image. The label is some location relative to the (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, FTX)
|
