Subject:
|
Re: why I love subfiles...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.ideas
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Jan 2004 01:14:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4982 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> > ...Versatility, my friends, versatility! (As in this example, below.)
> >
> >
> >
> > 0 FILE 3068bp40.dat
>
>
> Sorry, I don't get the message at all. In the example you gave, I see no reason
> for sub-filing at all. On the contrary, to me it looks like a typical example of
> very unnecessary subfiling.
>
> Please be more specific why sub-filing would add versatility in your example.
>
>
> /Tore
> (who really dislikes excessive use of subfiles)
I'm going to have to agree with Tore on this one. Subfile are useful for
repeated patterns and "without faces" parts, to me, your example seems to use
subfiles uneccesarily.
-Orion
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: why I love subfiles...
|
| (...) Sorry, I don't get the message at all. In the example you gave, I see no reason for sub-filing at all. On the contrary, to me it looks like a typical example of very unnecessary subfiling. Please be more specific why sub-filing would add (...) (21 years ago, 27-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
