Subject:
|
Re: why I love subfiles...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.ideas
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:16:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4596 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.ideas, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> ...Versatility, my friends, versatility! (As in this example, below.)
>
>
>
> 0 FILE 3068bp40.dat
Sorry, I don't get the message at all. In the example you gave, I see no reason
for sub-filing at all. On the contrary, to me it looks like a typical example of
very unnecessary subfiling.
Please be more specific why sub-filing would add versatility in your example.
/Tore
(who really dislikes excessive use of subfiles)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: why I love subfiles...
|
| (...) I'm going to have to agree with Tore on this one. Subfile are useful for repeated patterns and "without faces" parts, to me, your example seems to use subfiles uneccesarily. -Orion (21 years ago, 1-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | why I love subfiles... [DAT]
|
| ...Versatility, my friends, versatility! (As in this example, below.) 0 FILE 3068bp40.dat 0 Tile 2 x 2 with Magic Scroll Pattern 0 Name: 3068bp40.dat 0 Author: Andrew Westrate 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 CMDLINE -c15 0 KEYWORDS Castle, (...) (21 years ago, 26-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
