 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1. Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit. (I should note that if there was no (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: POLICE Pattern (was Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT) [DAT]
|
|
Whoops. I forgot to remove MLCAD's ROTATION meta commands, and to edit the name. Here's the real subpart, with correct heading. 0 ~POLICE Pattern 0 Name: s\3069bs18.dat 0 Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 Unofficial Element 0 BFC CERTIFY (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | POLICE Pattern (was Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT) [DAT]
|
|
Hi all: This message contains the subpart 3069bs18: POLICE pattern for 80's town sets. Notes: Corners of the pattern are X ±17 Y 0 Z ±5 giving the pattern overall dimensions of X 34 Y 0 Z 10 I cleared up the overlapping quads in the P, and verified (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: COG shifter off topic
|
|
(...) I used it because it is commonly used here, and because it is short. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | COG shifter off topic
|
|
hi ppl are we using COG TLA cause we like TLAs or because we differ COG and centroid? btw i like TLAs so COG is cool pixel (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
(...) It would be an honor. (...) Sounds like a blast! All my walkers will fit in the same space as Jama..... :^) I can see it now, a LEGO remake of Saturday Night Live's "Bambi meets Godzilla" LOL! Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
Oh my, that's brilliant! dang! BF03 is gonna rock! Let's set up all our stuff together! Mechanical Mayhem begins! Aug 03. e (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
|
(...) I see what you mean. We've actually started doing this for certain materials such as gold, silver, chrome, and rubber. Ldview and ldglite already tinker with the specular properties for some of these materials based on the predefined color (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
|
(...) Have you looked at ldview? It uses texture mapping to display the LEGO logos on the studs. (...) I was under the impression that they ALL use texture mapping nowadays to get more detail with less polygons. (...) Sure. Just do a google search (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT
|
|
(...) That's not a problem. I may have to do a little bit of scaling so that the corners have integer coordinates, and that the pattern's centered. But shouldn't take much time or effort. And I'll check on the overlapping quads. John (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT
|
|
(...) Thanx for the quick response. If you create a subpart with the police pattern, could you please put only the area where the text police fits in into that subpart and not the surrounding border to fill up a brick. (just like the fire logo and (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT
|
|
(...) As soon as I get my PT access restored, I'll make this correction. Thanks for picking up on this. (...) I picked p18 for police because it was unused across a large variety of parts. There's a variation on the POLICE pattern for the 1 x 4 x 3 (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts - Aquanauts Door and Door Frame
|
|
(...) for them. There must be a glitch in Peeron somewhere. For reference, the Peeron names for these parts are 2596 Door 1 x 9 x 11 2662 Door Frame 2 x 8 x 12 -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | door 1 x 3 x 1 new patterns and errors in parts on PT
|
|
Browsing the PT for the new subpart for the door 1 x 3 x 1 without stud I also took a look at the complete door parts on the PT and noticed the following errors in two parts: 3822p03 Door 1 x 3 x 1 Left with Yellow / Red Stripe Pattern Misspelled (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts - Aquanauts Door and Door Frame
|
|
Dear All, I am about to finish new parts: 2662 - Aquanaut Door Frame 2596 - Large Aquanaut Door You can see pictures here (URL) opinion Bricklink has better names for them. Please see here (URL) - Door Frame with Hinges 2596 - Door 1 x 9 x 11 with (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
Hi Philo, Great minds think alike. I did the same last night. I've got one build with studs up, and a second with studs down. I'm going to update the building instructions, and post the DAT files as well. I figure it is a good example of the new (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Partnames and patternumbers requested
|
|
(...) Will do. Steve (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another question about metal parts
|
|
(...) That sounds alright to me. Steve (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
...I forgot to tell you that I built mine using one top (2984) and one base (2985) micromotor caps instead of two tops, and it works well (useful since micromotor is/was supplied with one part of each type...) Philo (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Bendible parts Web Page
|
|
Yeah! I can't say right now that I would use it, but I have wanted the ability every now and then. And I am always for any software that will run on Macintosh, even if it is through a webpage (which is what you describe sounds like). James (...) (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
