 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) This needs to be changed - voting should be open for longer than one day, to give everyone the opportunity to vote. What do people think? I think it should be open 5 days or less, probably something like 3. Thoughts? -Tim (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about this and I think I mildly favor LSC elections open to all ldraw.org members. But I waver on it. (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Ok :-) (...) Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02? -Tim (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
|
(...) ...on the technical end of things, I think we should get a voting and membership system in place. Once that has been taken care of and tested, open up membership for the purpose of electing the first LSC. -Tim (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I'm actually half and half on it. I do see reasons why to limit it, but for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion. (...) Well, at least I haven't noticed it before, otherwise I would have probably mentioned it. But (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
|
(...) great! So what's the next step? Dan (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very important concern, (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl Help
|
|
(...) Dan (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) huh. (...) you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc group can vote? I think everyone can vote - but if we say that's not so, then I think the ad-hoc part should be removed. Why the special treatment? On Mon, May (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl Help
|
|
(...) And for lots of random tips tricks and forums, there's (URL) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) That statement (aside from the ad-hoc addition) was in Version 0.6, the first version I posted publicly. I found it in my local text file, as well as in the post here: (URL) strongly in favor of at least restricting the vote to only those (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I don't believe the beginning part is new (eligible LSC members can vote) it is new, but I added the ad-hoc group in there for those in the ad-hoc who are ineligible for LSC membership. Track Changes didn't highlight it in Word. I am for that (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: More information on LEGO Digital Designer and other things
|
|
(...) If this license is still not yet determined, I STRONGLY urge you to make sure your lawyers are famailiar with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. They are oriented towards a particular Linux distribution but are generally accepted to be a (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Monkeypede
|
|
(...) something like this: (URL) string "/1812/poo.ldr" should be in the environment variable PATH_INFO. (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego XML?
|
|
Here is an idea! Anyone used Rover before? (URL) idea is you have "block-sets" that you customize using XML to create worlds. The concept could be adapted for sets, very easily. IMO: I think it is a little redundant to have the same 2Lx2Wx1H block (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) This is new? Only the committee and people who are eligable for membership in the LSC can vote? I thought we were defining the general membership in LDraw.org so that everyone can vote? I think this paragraph should say: LDraw.org Members will (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Printable parts list/Lego visual dictionary?
|
|
(...) To find the trans colors in MLCad, just open the colors window. There's a sliders on the right side of the window, slide it down one "click". You should see all the trans colors. -Orion (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Printable parts list/Lego visual dictionary?
|
|
[ FUT lugnet.cad ] (...) Look at: (URL) Like whenever i am pov-ray-ing my trans-neon-green stuff I have to generate (...) That's a lack in MLCAD. The above list includes "trans-neon-green": Transparent green-yellow (?) LDraw: 42 RGB: 204 255 0 (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Enhancement requests
|
|
(...) That's exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks! I'll try it when I get home. Amy (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Enhancement requests
|
|
Amy, If you right click on a color box in the colors tool bar, you can change which color that box represents. MLCad will remember your colors between sessions too. HTH -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Amy Hughes" (...) bar, (...) (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
