 | | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) No I thin khe meant that only new and updated primitives are required to be BFC compliant to be accepted to the parts tracker. Parts are still accepted that aren't certified though that is preferable. Though I'm not sure I've seen anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote: > Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 1 > 9 INVERTNEXT 2 > 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a 3 > 9 subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately 4 > 9 (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A call to membership!
|
|
(...) Nope not yet. (...) Kevin (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: OT: Anyone heard from Michael Lachmann lately ?
|
|
(...) I just had email exchanges with him about permission to use his meta-command definitions in our LDraw specification document. Kevin (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw based import parts
|
|
(...) OK, cool; I might even make one of my students do it! LOL. But again, be aware we won't even be starting again until the Fall - August 2003...California's budget crisis has meant we had to cut a bunch of classes (including the one that was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A call to membership!
|
|
(...) Woot! :) (...) That would be cool. A little daunting, since L3P has quite a few nice controls, although LDGLite could probably handle them. I had talked with Don a year or more ago, and at the time we felt a tool-driven image renderer was the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat? [DAT]
|
|
The file has these lines: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat Is an empty line allowed after INVERTNEXT? Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 9 INVERTNEXT 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) insist? Did you mean await? The whole file including primitives should be BFC compliant to have the CERTIFY. (...) Yes, a NOCERTIFY can be considered as a (temporary) turn-off-BFC, and other BFC statements should silently be ignored. /Lars (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
|
(...) I like that. I think a clear indication that a comment is in fact a meta statement is needed. And I find "0 {META} " more distinct than (META), <META>, {BFC}, <BFC>, MODULENAME and whatever else has been suggested. But we're still stuck with (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | OT: Anyone heard from Michael Lachmann lately ?
|
|
I had been conversing with him about an MLCAD port via email back in December and January, but I haven't heard anything from him since ... I just hope everythings OK : ) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: converting SW assembly files to Ldraw??
|
|
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:51:39 GMT, "Nathanael Kuipers" <kuipers_n@hotmail.com> wrote: [...] (...) Such a program should not be complicated to write. But I think that the results could be disapointing. I explain why : Solidworks stores the assemblies (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw based import parts
|
|
I didn't take it as a "slam" but i appreciate the message. You might have actually noticed i cleaned up the folder a little bit, deleted some of the older cars. Two reasons for this- one there are a lot more models coming, after all i just got bunch (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | m6887 Allied Avenger [DAT]
|
|
File is in MPD format. From the Blacktron II series. 0 FILE m6887.ldr 0 6887 Allied Avenger 0 Name: m6887.ldr 0 Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 WRITE LDraw.org Official Model Repository 0 Official Model: ©1991 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m6590 Vacation Camper [DAT]
|
|
File is in MPD format. Includes x460.dat Container Suitcase by Franklin Cain (an unofficial part) 0 FILE m6590.ldr 0 6590 Vacation Camper 0 Name: m6590.ldr 0 Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 -13 100 1 (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m6655 Auto Tire Repair [DAT]
|
|
Set is in MPD format. BONUS: The alternate models from the box panels are also in this mpd. 0 FILE m6655.dat 0 6655 Auto & Tire Repair 0 Name: m6655.dat 0 Author: John Riley: Rohnjiley@yahoo.com 0 Official Model: ©1984 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: converting SW assembly files to Ldraw??
|
|
(...) Welcome to the club! You'd be surprised how many CAD users model LEGO using other systems and then later find out about LDraw. There's no constraints or assembly mates in LDraw though - at least not yet - so you probably won't be leaving SW (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw based import parts
|
|
(...) Hello Gregory, I agree, the shape of automobiles is hard to selectively compress in scale and still be "recognizable" as their full scale counterparts. I get the feeling it would almost be easier to model in microfig because you could get away (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
|
(...) Dan (& Todd?) - I wonder if it would be possible to add an option (similar to skip filter settings) which would allow the web interface user the choice of displaying dots on the message page for threads over 100 or not. The default could be (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
|
(...) just go here: (URL) you should see a "start this page" button. Then with a little bit of FTX (_really_ easy), you should be all set. FTX Guide: (URL) Dan Boger dan@peeron.com (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
|
(...) Hi Dan, I think that would be cool. Just let me know what to do. Kevin (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
