 | | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
|
(...) Train in my view is a very narrow group. There are a very few parts that belong in it. I would refer you to the PNLTC originated "diagram of train parts" that many train clubs use to discuss how easy it is to actually get started in trains. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
|
(...) The flip side of this arguement is that while it's only use may not be just for trains, the primary use is for trains. By your argument all the parts with the word Technic and Minifig in the title should be renamed as well. The reason that (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
|
(...) I agree (obviously since you referenced my post as your second ref)! (...) I disagree. That's not the intent. The license that is contemplated to be in effect does not let you as the author prevent people from submitting revisions to parts (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Renaming of 2916.dat
|
|
I would like to object on the strongest terms possible the "Modified part description" of the part 2916.dat. This is in keeping with my beliefs on how parts should be named. Please refer to: (URL) is not necessarily a train part. Is this file not my (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
|
(...) I like it, very nice work. (...) I think a closed bottom will work as I don't see a functional reason to have it not be (plus the save in file size will be good). -Orion (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Various Cylinder-type Objects [DAT]
|
|
(...) That would be cool. Not as smooth as I'd like, but cool. (...) Hmm. You mean start with <part:3742 Very Small Flower>? No, that wouldn't stack. Maybe <part:4728 flower on a 1x1 round brick>? If it looks like I imagine it might, it could be (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.ideas)
|
| |
| | New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
|
hi folks, have a look at the "beta-version" of the part I'm currently working on and tell me what do you think. any suggestions and critical statements are welcome, but please consider that some areas still need a lot of refinement. especially the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: High Quality Technic Friction Pegs DATS
|
|
(...) It's not just the lip that's missing, it's the little bumps on the pin itself that are missing. I'll grab the new files and give them a look. Thanks for the quck response. Cheers, Ralph (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: High Quality Technic Friction Pegs DATS
|
|
(...) Try part 2780.dat. It was released in part update 2002-02. Also, if you want to give some lip to your other Technic Pin-parts, grab the updated (but still unofficial) versions of the connect.dat, connect2.dat, connect3.dat, and connect4.dat (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | High Quality Technic Friction Pegs DATS
|
|
All, Is there a high-quality DAT out there for Technic friction pegs? The one that comes with the LDRAW package does not have the little ridges that actually provide the friction.... I need these to illustrate a point and have not been able to find (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
