 | | Duplo Studs (was: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02)
|
|
(...) Update: all four of them are waiting for Admin now. Thank you Carsten! -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Motorcycle rider shortcut
|
|
In this part: (URL) Easter refers at one point to BFCing the file. But there's no BFC stuff in there. It appears that the only change here is the title. Is it possible that Paul added it but then the name fix submission lacked that update? -- Tony (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
(...) If we want to bulk up the release and clear out a bit more from the tracker, it might be nice to get the Duplo stud primitives certified. Just getting those 4 files certified would get those plus 15 more files into the next release. When the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Female Ldraw Parts
|
|
(...) No, his minifig "female" legs do not really exist. (Unless he's been working in a secret lab somewhere...) Franklin (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
Since "973ps4" (the Han Solo w/ vest torso) is one of the files that is certified and awaiting release, I need to ask: Weren't we going to switch this file's pattern number with "973ps5" (the Darth Vader torso)?... (Ref: "(URL) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Female Ldraw Parts
|
|
(...) So then, the parts referred to upthread fit that definition? That's part of what I am confused about. Do these exist in real life or not? (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] Wrapping up 2002-02
|
|
All the Horse files, and most of the primitives updated with BFC'ness, are now certified! The one primitive not yet certified is p\48\1-4ndis.dat, but it is not the sole hold-up for any files. Over the next few days, I'll be working on getting the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Female Ldraw Parts
|
|
(...) Larry, You are correct. The term "unofficial file/part/subfile/[whatever]" does in fact mean "not yet released" or "not yet approved for release". To the best of my understanding, we've made no provision for any part that does not truly exist. (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
|
(...) Actually, transparent surface should work fine. As long as they are set to write to the Z buffer when drawn, and their outlines are drawn with Z buffer testing enabled, they should work fine. The wireframe parts that aren't supposed to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
|
(...) One problem: transparent surfaces would show the wireframe backside. :\ Steve (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Baseplates with pattern
|
|
(...) I suppose that would be a problem. It would be more of a problem, if stud-logos were part of LDraw. It would also be more of a problem, if this were a smaller part. By the time people get to using 32x32 baseplates, they aren't usually looking (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Baseplates with pattern
|
|
(...) Not unless the subparts would be used multiple times within the part file. Just put the code for the painted studs in the part file. Steve (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: new axle hole (part two)
|
|
(...) Yes, yes you do. I believe you have the descriptions for 4 and 5 reversed. :-) 2 - (and so do I) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: new axle hole (part two)
|
|
(...) Lack of planning, I think. ;) Seriously, the axleholes are more complex than most other types of primitives, and presented in different ways in LEGO bricks. So there's a need for more variations. Just for fun,[1] I put together a gallery of (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: new axlehole (part1)
|
|
(...) [snipped DAT code] Mark, Is this primitive supposed to be a substantially different profile than axleho11.dat? Other than splitting it into two different files. (URL) Steve (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Some pov-ray questions
|
|
(...) You just need to find out how to compose a table AKA an array in the POV-Ray language, then you need to find out how to include a file indexed in the table. This is probably covered in the manual. To compose an array with 1500 different file (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | new axle hole (part two) [DAT]
|
|
and the second part. If people think I should I would be willing to combine them into a single file. Why so many axle hole primitives anyway? 0 4 16 2 0 2 5.58 0 2 5.52 0 2.28 4.26 0 4.26 4 16 2 0 2 4.26 0 4.26 2.28 0 5.52 2 0 5.58 4 16 -2 0 -2 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | new axlehole (part1) [DAT]
|
|
Plus a new type of axlehole 0 4 16 0 -0.00 -6 -2 -0.00 -5.66 -2 -1.00 -5.66 0 -1.00 -6 2 24 -2 -0.00 -5.66 -2 -1.00 -5.66 4 16 -2 -1.00 -5.66 -2 -0.00 -5.66 -2 -0.00 -2 -2 -1.00 -2 2 24 -2 -0.00 -2 -2 -1.00 -2 4 16 -2 -1.00 -2 -2 -0.00 -2 -5.66 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | double bevel gear tooth [DAT]
|
|
Here is a new primitive for those double beveled technich gears. 0 Double Bevel Technic Gear Tooth 0 Name: bevcog.dat 0 Author: Mark Kennedy 0 taken out of 32270.dat by Marc Klein 0 3 16 0 3 -10 1.31 -0.09 -10 -1.31 -0.09 -10 2 24 0 3 -10 1.31 -0.09 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
|
I was reading through this more, and while I still don't know exactly how it all works, I think I stumbled onto something. > I dont know how many of you have come across this technique before. I > remember finding an OpenGL demo that did this kind (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
