 | | Re: A couple of tutorial items (Was: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones)
|
|
(...) Back to boot camp for you, mister. :-, (...) Here's what it appears like: // Camera (Latitude,Longitude,Radius = 0,180,0) camera { #declare PCT = 0; // Percentage further away #declare STEREO = 0; // Normal view file://#declare STEREO = (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: JAVA - Viewer for dat-Files
|
|
"James Reynolds" <james.e.reynolds@m.....utah.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:GqEDsG.3p4@lugnet.com... (...) Actually it's more application than applet, but I don't know at the moment, whether I will make it an editor, just as filesaving. The (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: JAVA - Viewer for dat-Files
|
|
"TWS Garrison" <tgarriso@math.purdue.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:GqEG1q.D4s@lugnet.com... (...) So you need java 1.2 and java3D 1.2 or higher, take a look at my homepage: www.broich.onlinehom...plete.html Sascha (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Pieces
|
|
I asked similar question long time ago, but no answers. You can find switch point here ((Mock-up file) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 9V Train Track Pieces
|
|
Has anyone built the 9V Train Track Pieces for Ldraw? I looked at the parts tracker and there is no sign of them there. I know that someone a while back made a straight track piece. I got that piece 2865.dat. But what about curves, crosstrack, and (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) Thanks, Manfred. This link is now fixed. Steve (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Ice Planet contest questions
|
|
(...) I understand your dilemma. The rules will probably be similar to the BT1 Contest (see (URL) although they are far from having been finalized. Design your LDraw model using what elements you have and if you feel up to it, you can create the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
Hello Team, On Ldraw.org I've found a link that is still broken: On page: (URL) the text body just above the list there is a link named "Certification Report" (behind "Also, view the "). Currently this points incorrectly to: (URL) believe it should (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) I'll wait for your public response. Steve (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
This has been addressed privately. I will deal with the contents publicly later. -Tim (...) [SNIP] (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) Why not? It's not like anyone has said, "I don't like fixed-width pages; they really waste space on my super-duper hi-res monitor". Most of the postings I've read have been useful and to the point. If people have problems with the website, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) Yes, this is definitely on the list of enhancements for the Parts Tracker. It will either be accomplished when the two part-list pages are combined into a single dynamic, sortable, searchable page, or when we create a "My Parts Tracker" page. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) This area is mostly online, but still being checked for errors. Use it with caution. (...) The Part Updates area is all fixed. Steve (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) My mistake. I totally forgot about that when I made the rendering. I chose the shiled color as gray, because all shields are gray, I forgot it was hard-coded. And I gotta get rid of the Red Futuron's yellow hands too ;-) (...) Of course. To my (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) What are you asking me for? You did the rendering. It's part 3846p43. It's one of those special patterned parts, where main color specifies the *pattern* color, not the base part's color. In this case, it's the border color. If it rendered (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Java - Viewer for dat-files
|
|
(...) Right. See (URL) for a little more information. Steve (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones
|
|
(...) I don't think this has been reported yet (I think the page is pretty new). On this page (URL) are asked to select an operating system, and given three choices. Should DOS be there too? (It's in the navigation bar just below, along with the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: JAVA - Viewer for dat-Files
|
|
(...) Yes. A a .DAT or .LDR viewer in an applet would be helpful for quickly viewing parts too new/unexamined for Partsref (or parts, such as minfig heads, that are too small in Partsref to really examine). It would especially be useful for users (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: JAVA - Viewer for dat-Files
|
|
(...) I would like to see this make the leap from applet to application so that it has file-saving priveleges. Then I would like to see it have editing ability! Multi-platform is good. Java is good. -- Thanks: James Reynolds (URL) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A couple of tutorial items (Was: Known bugs on the site and how to report new ones)
|
|
(...) One such example is if I were creating building instructions for a mecha and wanted to focus on the left foot for a particular step. I think it's pretty well established that a true orthographic projection makes for the easiest to understand (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
