 | | Can LDGLite print the current orientation matrix? (feature request)
|
|
I have been playing a bit around with the interactive rotation mode in LDGLite to find a good angle on my cargo aircraft. I think I have found it now, but how can I get LDGLite to print the parameters as a: a) complete set of command line arguments (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Good point. I support that change. (...) Jacob (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite colour bug
|
|
(...) Same example, but a different problem. :-) (...) :-) No. It was Steve's publishing of a fresh parts release that got me started looking through my old bug reports. For some reason I hit "q" while looking at the example from my old bug report, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
I made a quick test of Leocad under XP, works (almost) fine. The only quirk I got was with part preview window that was half black. But this problem is solved by slightly resizing it. Are you sure you tested latest version, previous one didn't work (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) This is a good and important point. If the category "round" is to take the same functionality as, say, the "slope" category, it would be more correct to rename existing parts into Round Plate 2 x 2 Round Brick 2 x 2 and so on. After all, slope (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
I just got a new computer for christmas. Unfortuantely it has windows xp on it and won't run many of my old programs, including Ldraw, Ledit, and LeoCad. Has anyone found a way to get these programs to run in xp? (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Excellent idea. (...) Not bad. What do we do about <part:4032> (Plate 2 x 2 Round)? Is "plate" or "round" most important? I presume that we should stick to the current name and add "round" as an extra category. A similar question concerns (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting 2 .dat models [DAT]
|
|
(...) One solution is to compose a new model file which reads from the two you want to combine. For example, compose a file called "model.dat", with contents like this: 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 file1.dat 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 file2.dat (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2001-03 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot Steve for this New Years present ;-) BTW : A happy New Year to all Lugnet users. Regards, Ludo (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Yes. I'm guessing (based on past experience) that it won't be the next parts update (2002-01), but maybe the one after that (2001-02). But who knows? If we get three part reviewers who decide to work together to change the part names and post (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
