 | | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
(...) Yes, it is a static page, regenerated every 10 minutes. (...) Sorry, the list was not being rebuilt, due to a stupid programmer error. It's fixed now. Steve (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part: Excavator arm / bucket (small)
|
|
(...) With all the various buckets and related accessories released by LEGO, I think this description is a bit vague. Which sets feature the parts you are looking for? (...) Irregularly shaped parts like excavator buckets are very difficult to model (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Part: Excavator arm / bucket (small)
|
|
Does anyone have a DAT for the small digger/excavator arm and bucket? I'm surprised to find this old favourite missing when other 'upstarts' (e.g. Mindstorms) are all there! Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
(...) I think I am still a little confused. Does the Lani program take a single .dat file and spit out 144 .dat (or .pov?) files that all have the right angles to make a 360 degree QTVR movie? Or do you have 144 .dat files that are "masters" that I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
(...) Great news Steve - thanks for all the work you've put into this. I plan to review the parts which I have IRL (and didn't author myself) this weekend. Or can I "certify" my own parts, also? Chris (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
QTVR seems pretty stable. I wonder if you could use it to create something a lot like the DAT-explorer? Hmm... Interesting. -Mike (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
this sounds cooool! I'm interested in seeing more! Gary James Reynolds <james.e.reynolds@m.....utah.edu> wrote in message news:GKowCC.2Ks@lugnet.com... (...) pixels), (...) up). (...) post (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
"James Reynolds" <james.e.reynolds@m.....utah.edu> wrote in message news:GKowCC.2Ks@lugnet.com... (...) pixels), (...) up). (...) post (...) I (...) Ooo cool :-) Any chance of getting a higher-res version? I'm running 1600x1200 and its teensy ;-) (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
(...) Way cool! Just one question, is this a static page updated periodically? Just wondering 'cos (not wanting to blow my own horn) my x121 Air Horn shows up with a Y on the standard list, but no Y votes on the certification status list. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker News
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:GKpB3L.Hus@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) list, (...) Comments (...) Nifty! (...) library (...) yet; (...) Coolness. Thanks a ton, Steve! Keep it up :-) -Tim LDraw.org (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 Brick Editing [DAT]
|
|
Never mind! I hacked the text file and added 2 studs (see file for up to date RCX 2.0 if interested). (...) 0 Electric Mindstorms RCX Module 2.0 0 Name: RCX20.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Left Half 0 Front Left Face 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | RCX 2.0 Brick Editing [DAT]
|
|
Hi, I've got an RCX 2.0 brick model but the problem is it is missing 2 studs near the back (right over where the A/C port used to be). Can someone help me out with this? BTW: Where are .DAT files supposed to be posted now? Looks like the regular (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker News
|
|
Just a few quick items. Some good news, some not-as-good news. First, there's a new report-page, which shows the 'certification status' for each part. The parts that are ready for release are at the top of the list, the rest are below. And the most (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
(...) I made a webpage and here it is: (URL) I made this webpage with the intention that I would be further along than I am. In other words, it speaks as if I have done things I haven't. And, I planned on having the actual dat file downloads (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Winners of LDraw.org's October 2001 Model/Scene Of The Month
|
|
Terry: (...) I can automate the hard parts. (...) What about letting the computer have the lack of breathing space? (...) I would rather choose: * Entry deadline on the 23rd of each month. * Voting commences on the 1st of each month (assuming that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Missing wheels?
|
|
I'm looking for the like in 8218, the small technic wheels, but they don't seem to exist in MLCAD. Not in Lugnet part ref either for that matter... It's 2994 on this page: (URL) it simply not exist, or have I just been looking in the wrong places? (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Car QTVR object.
|
|
(...) Sorry I am just now catching up on this. Can you explain what this is? (...) Cool! I look forward to see this! (...) I certainly am. I think QTVR rocks. (...) Does your program auto-create these? If I wanted to make them myself, does Lani (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Winners of LDraw.org's October 2001 Model/Scene Of The Month
|
|
(...) Thank you, Fredrik. (...) Hmm... My only problem is concerns about confusion (mine), and timeliness. Having voting going on back-to-back would require me to do a some juggling. And would require that pages get updated promptly at the turn of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New Car QTVR object.
|
|
I recreated the CAR.DAT QuickTime Virtual Reality object. This one was rendered in POV-Ray, and is very small (about 100x100 pixels), but big (444 K). Again, it doesn't seem to work with Netscape. It is almost 360 degree rotation on x and y axis (it (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New part: 30343 Window 4 x 10 x 2 Slope Double
|
|
(...) (note: despite the difference in dimensions, they are the same parts) (...) They were unofficial parts, posted to this newsgroup some time ago. As far as I can tell, Thomas never submitted them for official consideration. You might want to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
