 | | Re: About installing/Reinstalling Ldraw and about datville
|
|
I rendered Town00.dat in 800x600. It took 7 minutes and 15 seconds. Last night, I rendered 5 submodels + townpeep.dat at 640x480. It took 2 hours and 44 minutes. (Same combination at quality=0 took something like 20-30 seconds). What I learned fom (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
|
Not a full suggestion, but just a thought. I've thought about calling them "minimized" parts, and maybe the extention .min intead of .box. There is a problem though. I have two different areas in which I could use different levels of simplification: (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | DO-OVER --- September MOTM/SOTM
|
|
Hi all, OK. Jacob has fixed things on the new server [ thanks, Jacob ], and patiently explained to me how it works, [ not an easy task :-) ] so the voting is back on. But it's a DO-OVER!! Starting from scratch, so get over there and cast your vote. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Model 6824: Space Dart-I [DAT]
|
|
I was having problems getting this to work in MLCAD so I put it in mpd format. 0 FILE m6824.dat 0 Model #6824: Space Dart I 0 Digital verison by: James Jackson 0 At a later date, #6824 will be recolored for H:Masters. 0 Converted to MPD format by (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
|
This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them ttore boxes, for short), and the making of new boxes have no corresponding Lego part. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on how I should name the files of new boxes I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another LDrawn town (Was: Another house for datville?)
|
|
(...) I'm more interested in the methods he used, so that I can replicate it. (...) I think growing interest via this method might be exponential, instead of linear (as is true of the current method). (...) I really think that would be a better idea (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: About installing/Reinstalling Ldraw and about datville
|
|
Here's a question that may sound strange, but I'll explain why I'm asking it at the bottom of this message. Does anyone know how long it takes to render Datsville vs. rendering each submodel within Datsville seperately? I was thinking, that with (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts list bug?
|
|
I am running MLCad 2.00 R 4 and I think I may have found a bug in the report for parts I have a large model with several submodels. If I check parts per step and leave submodels unchecked it seems to generate a correct list for the main model. But (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Parts list bug?
|
|
I am running MLCad 2.00 R 4 and I think I may have found a bug in the report for parts I have a large model with several submodels. If I check parts per step and leave submodels unchecked it seems to generate a correct list for the main model. But (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 1749 Unnamed
|
|
Do you have these parts anywhere ? Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:386F45F8.3BEE41...ail.com... (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
