Subject:
|
Re: "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:54:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1515 times
|
| |
|
|
Not a full suggestion, but just a thought. I've thought about calling them
"minimized" parts, and maybe the extention .min intead of .box.
There is a problem though. I have two different areas in which I could use
different levels of simplification: One is making life easier for POV-Ray
without any visible interference. The other is for example replacing a pine
tree with a cone; a very visible replacement, but not so crude as setting
Quality=0 in POV-Ray (for example).
To have both .box and .min would be a solution, but probably too complicated.
/Tore
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Horvath writes:
> This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them
> ttore boxes, for short), and the making of new boxes have no corresponding
> Lego part.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on how I should name the files
> of new boxes I create that have no corresponding Lego part. An example of
> these might be a 1 x 5 x 10 brick.
>
> I would be willing to create a bunch of these, as well as headers in
> existing "Tore" boxes. E.G. "Box 2 x 4"
>
> If anyone's interested, please respond.
>
>
> Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
| This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them ttore boxes, for short), and the making of new boxes have no corresponding Lego part. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on how I should name the files of new boxes I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
