Subject:
|
Re: "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:05:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1525 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Horvath writes:
> This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them
> ttore boxes, for short),
I'm still thinking about this. Awhile ago, there was discussion of having a
"0 DETAIL" meta-statement, to identify which lines in a DAT were critical
for rendering, and which lines filled in the details. This approach could
be used to reduce rendering, without having separate files.
And we might need to address dat simplifications separately from POV-Ray
simplifications...
> and the making of new boxes have no corresponding
> Lego part.
Hmm. I think I can clearly state that non-LEGO-part files won't be included
in the LDraw part library. I just don't see it happening.
Now, if we can put together some additional geomtric shapes, and add them to
the primitives library, that would be OK, and might help.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
|
| This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them ttore boxes, for short), and the making of new boxes have no corresponding Lego part. I was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on how I should name the files of new boxes I (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
