To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 2878
2877  |  2879
Subject: 
"Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:17:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1465 times
  
This is regarding the "officialization" of Tore's boxes (I'll call them
ttore boxes, for short), and the making of new boxes have no corresponding
Lego part.

I was wondering if anyone had any suggestion on how I should name the files
of new boxes I create that have no corresponding Lego part.  An example of
these might be a 1 x 5 x 10 brick.

I would be willing to create a bunch of these, as well as headers in
existing "Tore" boxes.  E.G. "Box 2 x 4"

If anyone's interested, please respond.


Mike



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
 
Not a full suggestion, but just a thought. I've thought about calling them "minimized" parts, and maybe the extention .min intead of .box. There is a problem though. I have two different areas in which I could use different levels of simplification: (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
  Re: "Tore's" boxes, special file naming instructions
 
(...) I'm still thinking about this. Awhile ago, there was discussion of having a "0 DETAIL" meta-statement, to identify which lines in a DAT were critical for rendering, and which lines filled in the details. This approach could be used to reduce (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR